Two decades after a convicted sex offender lured a 7-year-old named Megan into his house with the promise of seeing a new puppy, then killed her, the law that bears her name remains broadly popular, but gets mixed reviews. Full Article
Related posts
-
TX: Texas Sues Pornhub for Failing to Check IDs
Source: news.yahoo.com 2/28/24 The first age verification lawsuit against a major web porn purveyor is here.... -
UK accuses Meta of empowering child sexual abusers with encryption rollout
Source: theguardian.com 12/7/23 Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has been accused by the UK government of empowering child... -
NJ: Governor, in veto, recommends barring sex offenders from mental health diversion programs
Source: newjerseymonitor.com 11/29/23 Gov. Phil Murphy this week conditionally vetoed a bill that would expand an intervention program...
I wonder if a child of RC is killed due to these laws, will any kind of law be made in the name of that child?
Maybe I am just too darn observant, but for a law that is supposed to make communities safer and prevent sex offenses it is doing a terrible job. I challenge anyone to come up with a singular pro that isn’t outweighed by a singular con in Megan’s law.