Two decades after a convicted sex offender lured a 7-year-old named Megan into his house with the promise of seeing a new puppy, then killed her, the law that bears her name remains broadly popular, but gets mixed reviews. Full Article
Related posts
-
NJ: Don’t set up your own vigilante ‘stings,’ cops caution after N.J. video goes viral
Source: nj.com 9/4/26 Police are cautioning the public against conducting private “stings” after a group of... -
NJ: Sex abuse claims against Boys & Girls Clubs of America can’t move forward, court rules
Source: newjerseymonitor.com 8/19/26 The Boys & Girls Clubs of America cannot be held liable for alleged... -
NY: Lawsuits over sex abuse of children in state custody could cost NJ $340M+
Source: newjerseymonitor.com 4/14/26 Ongoing lawsuits filed by people who say they were sexually abused as children...

I wonder if a child of RC is killed due to these laws, will any kind of law be made in the name of that child?
Maybe I am just too darn observant, but for a law that is supposed to make communities safer and prevent sex offenses it is doing a terrible job. I challenge anyone to come up with a singular pro that isn’t outweighed by a singular con in Megan’s law.