DC: why did DC house a sex offender near women and children?

My goal in the coming year is to better understand why some things, in this brief and transitory life, are as they seem to be. Not to accept it, necessarily, but just to be able to make sense of it.

For instance, I am unable to figure out why D.C. taxpayers are being called upon to provide shelter for a man who, according to Mark Segraves of WRC-TV (Channel 4), was charged with several sex offenses and assaults in Prince George’s County nine years ago, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a year and a half in prison. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mr. King of the Washington Post,

I just read your recent piece, Colbert King: Why did D.C. house a sex offender near women and children? http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/colbert-king-why-did-dc-house-a-sex-offender-with-women-and-children/2014/12/26/ee14df22-8ba2-11e4-a085-34e9b9f09a58_story.html

I have been following the news on Eulis Knox living in the D.C. shelter as a Registered Sex Offender (RSO) along with his girlfriend and her daughter. There have been no claims of abuse by Mr. Knox at the shelter. I have noticed how many reporters and columnists have included the story of Relisha Rudd who was taken by a shelter employee who was NOT an RSO attempting to connect the two issues as one simply because of the location.

Once Mr. Knox’s status as an RSO was discovered he was moved to another shelter, but that’s not acceptable to you!

You know when people start a sentence with “I’m not a racist, but…….” And in the end it turns out they are a big old racist, well that’s pretty much exactly what your column does. “The milk of human kindness flows freely throughout my body. I believe in lifting up the lowly, scattering the proud and making sure the hungry have something to eat. I long for a world of no pain, tears or mourning. I try to open the door to my heart to others. But….”

You go on to then say, “The obligation to place convicted sex offenders in ¬taxpayer-supported housing is a city priority beyond my grasp”.

That’s not human kindness.

That’s not lifting up the lowly.

That’s not opening your hear to others, that’s slamming it tight and screaming I don’t deem you worthy.

That’s denying them a second chance.

That’s refusing them shelter, food and support.

You’re trying to promote mandatory reporting in your column but you are in fact outraged with the “obligation” to place RSO’s in a taxpayer-supported shelter.

That Mr. King, is cruel and unusual punishment.

• Do the D.C. shelters ask about drug dealer convictions? No.
• Do the D.C shelters ask about drug user convictions? No.
• Do the D.C. shelters ask about murder convictions? No.
• Do the D.C. shelters ask about robbery convictions? No.
• Do the D.C shelters ask about burglary or larceny convictions? No.

But they do ask about sexual convictions, the second lowest recidivism (re-offense) rate nationwide.


Because of the myth, fear, hate and prejudice against those who are listed on America’s public Sex Offender Registries.

Don’t try to cloak your true intent under the guise of “human kindness flows freely through my body”. Just like the Grinch, your “heart is an empty hole”. Emotion, anger and vengeance is the driving force to “weed out” the RSO’s just like your column claims not to be about those Sex Offender Registries or denying those in need with assistance but in the end that’s exactly what your column is about, hate and anger towards Registered Sex Offenders. At least own it, if you’re going to use your column to preach it.

Mary Devoy
A volunteer advocate for data-driven reform of Virginia’s Sex Offender Registry and Laws since October 2008


King’s column was pretty ugly, but the responses were quite good. More are needed.