SERIAL KILLINGS: Case puts sex-offender monitoring under fire

Sitting on her couch with her two dogs, Detective Laura Lomeli peered at a series of red GPS dots on her laptop, searching for clues about a young woman whose mangled, nude body had been discovered weeks before on a recycling facility’s conveyor belt. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, this is crazy. GPS ankle bracelets do not work to prevent crime, this we know. Here is a simple rule I came across once: if it doesn’t work, stop doing it.

YES! If something is broken either fix it or ditch it!

Hate to ever sound judgemental, but aren’t these the real sex offenders. Ignoring laws, time and again, with a total total disregard. And I am grouped in with these type of people? Two traffic tickets and a bad choice. But their actions will cause me pain and angouish the rest of my life. Thanks guys, for screwing up the world for us.

For the time I was on probation I had to wear a GPS monitor. Technically it was parole because I did a year in prison but because I was under AB 109 they put me in probation. I had to deal with the monitor for 12 months and the compliance checks but if I wanted to I could have broken the terms of my probation easily.

I was terminated from probation in full compliance and with no violations, but to be honest I did not always comply. The only thing the GPS prevented me from doing was leaving my 50 mile radius and loitering around a park or school.

The problem is that the GPS monitoring is like the police. They rarely prevent anything. They can only help after the crime has occurred. I have never heard of a police officer stopping a rape or child molestation from taking place. The only time a rape or molestation is ever prevented is when the potential victim fights off their attacker. Maybe the focus should change from correction to prevention.

Hello, I am a first-time poster here. I’m preparing for my brother’s release in 3 weeks and have a question about the gps he will be required to wear. He signed the conditions of his parole just yesterday, and during his phone call was clearly overwhelmed and not able to talk for long. He said he has a 35 mile radius and that his parole was actually in a city just outside of our county. Can someone clarify? Is it not a regular 50-radius for gps? There are no special circumstances that would require even tighter restriction on him, but of course, he signed and agreed to every condition lest they pull the same tactic that they used to get him to plea in the first place.

thanks for all the comments and sharing… the posts have been very helpful.