ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

National

NV: Bill would exempt more crimes from sex offender registration

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) – Nevada lawmakers are considering a bill that would exempt more people from registering as sex offenders.

Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee reviewed AB208 on Tuesday. The measure would only require someone to register as a sex offender if they’ve been convicted of a felony sex crime, not a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. G4Change

    I haven’t read the content of this bill. However, judging from the AP Article, it sounds like it makes sense! Nevada was smart to set aside the Adam Walsh Act. They have a tiered registry. That’s a state moving in the right direction! I hope CA and others will follow.

  2. mike

    The AWA actually calls for tiers…they’re just way over the top. This is a great, yet simple bill, that adds the wording “as a felony” to require registration.has a lot of co-sponsor already, I just hope it doesn’t get bogged down with amendments to ruin it. Calling my assemblyman today to talk about it.

  3. MatthewLL

    This is a very good start. The bill is less than four pages and simply puts the phrase “if punished as a felony” in front of the definition and list of sex offenses. It includes out-of-state offenses requiring registration in the state of conviction as well. So all out-of-state misdemeanor offenses are exempt as sex offenses if this bill passes. There are 26 sponsors in the assembly, most of which are republicans. Let’s hope this bill gets passed and signed into law, but don’t hold your breath.

    • JohnDoeUtah

      Wonder what this means for Courts-Martial? Title 10 of the US Code does not define courts-martial offenses as felonies or misdemeanors. No court can change that, by adding wording to the law. Any re-write could not be applied retroactively as it would increase the severity of the crime. When we get out of military confinement, the transition personnel make it a point to tell us we don’t have felonies, our crimes are undefined – so technically we can say no to felony status on job applications and not be at fault.

  4. MatthewLL

    John Doe, my interpretation is that if the punishment was equivalent to a felony in Nevada, then the offense would apply. That is my plain reading of the bill as it stands. So if the sentence to jail was a year or less, then it would not qualify as a felony. The language says “if punished as a felony”. Though like most poorly drafted legislation, it is never as clear as it should ne. It is a little ambiguous, but I do believe this is a good start in the right direction.

    There are both assembly members and senators who are sponsoring this bill. The hearing was on the 10th, but meeting minutes are not yet available. The one exhibit was from an attorney supporting the change and recommending more changes to the SOR statute. I saw nothing in opposition to this measure and that is surprising to me.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.