California grapples with where sex offenders can reside

California cities and counties are grappling with how far they can go to restrict where sex offenders can live amid a shifting legal landscape.

The California Supreme Court last month struck down San Diego’s blanket enforcement of a state law banning registered sex offenders from living near schools or parks. The Supreme Court said sex offenders can still be banned from living near parks and schools, but such a determination must be made on a case-by-case basis. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Come on Runner, bring it on and be loud. The states constituents want to hear your lies.

the new regulations should be made public to parolees so our PO’s cant try and say “oh, yea, you’re still high risk”. I doubt i am, but somehow just having to take her word for it isn’t good enough for me

I find it amazing that Runner is still looked upon with any kind of credibility; especially after all the misconceptions and myth, not to mention all the outright false statements, as well as the facts and truth about all this garbage is being exposed through the press.

Is there any way to sue the Runners for fraud?

I tried to comment several times at the bottom of the online article. Yet they were erased or never posted.
Anyone else have this problem?

I am probably going to start using the Euro key for such words.

Ironically, any incarceration of “e,” even in foreign typography (such as sèx, séx, sêx, or sëx) cannot get by most censors, but s€x works. Even the asterisk is being censored.

To type “s€x” using the euro key, type “s”, then press the “Alt” key while typing “0128” from the keypad (Alt+0128), then “x” to complete the word. You can also add it to your dictionary.