OUR OPINION: Restricting where sex offenders can live will not stop abuse

Maine – It’s hard to fault the Biddeford City Council for wanting to do something, anything, to help assuage the fears and frustrations related to the sexual abuse allegations that have come to light in recent months.

The stories of abuse and the subsequent shame, anger and depression are enough to make your heart ache and blood boil, and to compel you to do whatever you can to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Restricting where child sex offenders can live, as Biddeford councilors did on Tuesday, is the most obvious way for the council to react. As a local legislative body, it may be all it can do. Unfortunately, it won’t make the children of Biddeford any safer. In fact, it may make them less so. Full Opinion Piece

Related posts

Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, lets first be honest. If you truly have an issue or problem and want to commit a crime, almost nothing can or will stop you. If I had an issue, I would get into my car and drive somewhere? So, how does prohibiting someone from living in a certain area make anyone safer? IN addition, as already noted, these silly laws are breaking up families, causing people to lose jobs and many lawmakers are causing more harm then good! Yet, we had the DA of ie: OC prohibiting people from visiting parks, libraries and even beaches? Can you imagine anyone being banned from the beach? I believe one man even lost his job, because it was located near the Ocean? As everyone is aware, when people are working, obtaining higher educated, marrying and being family oriented, the recidivism rate drops significantly. So, that less than 2 percent rate drops even more. These laws create hysteria, anger, break up families and for the layman person, its scares them! Yet, we have murderers, gang members, prostitutes, drive by shooters and wife beaters running around with more rights! Wake up America !

I agree with USA, I just saw on the news tonight a man on Halloween ran over three girls killed them ,he’s a repeat offender drunk driver, hit and run , and he gets 14 years in prison he’ll be out in eight and he’ll be a freeman. When he gets out he won’t have to register with the police he will be free to leave the country he will be free to do what he wants and he killed three teenage girls . It seems these laws are upside down and I’m sure getting sick of it .

At least the writer knows it won’t prevent any crimes, it’s a shame the city council refused to acknowledge that. The writer did fail to mention the recent decision here in California when mentioning other states.

On residency restrictions, from the now offline RSOL New Jersey FAIR dated in 2011:

“In a 2004 “Criminal Law Bulletin” article…Eric Janus argued that sexual predator laws provide a model for undercutting Constitutional protections. The process, Janus said, starts with a universally despised group of people who, like suspected terrorists attract no public sympathy. He warned that we are at are at risk of becoming a “preventative state” in which the paradigm of governmental social control has shifted from solving and punishing crimes that have been committed to identifying “dangerous” people, and depriving them of their liberty before they can do harm. To most Americans, I fear, this prospect is not nearly as scary as the possibility that a sex offender lives down the street.” Jacob Sullivan/ reason.com.