What’s In a Date?

When Frank Lindsay walked into his home to find a young man wielding two hammers—one in each hand—in his dining room, he assumed he had disrupted a robbery. It wasn’t until the man called him a “pervert” that Lindsay realized he was the target of a planned attack. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

These criminal government agencies routinely operate outside of their own “sex offender” laws. I would say they do it nearly all the time, almost without exception. In the state where I live, the information that is forced by law to be given to them is well-defined and yet all the law enforcement agencies that I have ever seen or heard about always ask for more information than is required by law. It would be completely trivial for all LE agencies in the state to use the exact same forms/methods to get the required information. But obviously that would be too easy and make way too much sense for them. Each one of the agencies wants to do their own thing outside of the law. They can’t even run a simple list.

But anyway, forcing California to follow their own laws is a wonderful thing. But this emphasis on the dates seems to almost imply that if a person was recently put on the Registry, then he/she is fair game to be attacked for a while. It’s like we want to make sure the vigilantes are attacking the most recent offenders. I know that is not the point but it certainly seems to be the implication.

And I also have to note that it is completely insane that Frank Lindsay’s attacker will not be Registered. Surely that is because breaking into a person’s home and attacking them with hammers is not really that dangerous. I mean, what’s a hammer attack when compared to a child seeing genitals. One ruins a person for life.

Nice statistics. For once they are correct.

That says it all, I wish we can get a class action lawsuit against the registry for anybody convicted of any sex offense that has been on the registry for the 17 years , we should all have a way to get off the registry after 17 years . There is a study that shows after 17 years of being on the registry you are just as likely to reoffend as someone who is never committed a sex offense . So that tells me after 17 years of being on the registry it is no longer regulatory it becomes punitive .

One would think that a successful lawsuit could be mounted by a competent attorney by this poor guy. Clearly the state provided in the information that allowed this murderous lunatic the to target this citizen…who has certainly done more than “paid his debt to society” long ago and yet are intent on prolonging the punishment for the rest of his life! Madness!

When will this stop? How many must die simply because Americans lose their freaking minds at the mention of the word S-E-X? Pathetic really…

This virtual prison they have created in the USA is paramount to a social death sentence and in many cases an actual death sentence! This must stop – this is a CLEAR violation of constitutional rights as well as basic HUMAN RIGHTS!