AB 2569 passed by Assembly Public Safety Committee

The Public Safety Committee today passed an amended version of Assembly Bill (AB) 2569. The bill, authored by committee vice chair Melissa Melendez, originally removed an exemption for some registrants convicted of incest from being added to the Megan’s Law website. The amended version of the bill requires the California Department of Justice to interview the victim of the offense and to make a subsequent determination regarding whether information regarding the registrant should be added to that website.

California RSOL opposed the original bill as well as the amended bill in a letter to the Committee as well as in testimony at the Committee hearing.

“Assembly Bill 2569 is predatory legislation that will destabilize families and re-victimize victims,” testified CA RSOL president Janice Bellucci. “The amendment will provide the California Department of Justice with unfettered discretion because the bill does not provide the agency with guidelines by which to make its decisions.”

CA RSOL board member Pamela George also testified at the hearing and spoke in opposition to the bill.
“It’s important that the committee apply empirical evidence and not take action based upon on emotion,” stated George.

The Committee approved the bill by a vote of 6 to 1, with the dissenting vote from Assembly member Bill Quirk who said he voted against the bill because of George’s testimony.

During his remarks, Quirk stated that the registry is “too long already”. He added that he believes that the registry should be limited to those likely to re-offend or who have committed the most serious offenses.

Assembly Bill 2569 will next be considered by the Appropriations Committee. If the bill passes that committee, it will next be considered on the Assembly floor and then move to the Senate Public Safety Committee for further consideration.

———————- Related ———————————–

New bill stops loophole for sex offenders not registering online

From an attendee (from comments below):

I showed up at the Legislative hearing on Tuesday prepared to help oppose AB 2569. Even though all I would be able to do is state my name, city, and that I wished them to vote “nay”, I felt as though by doing that I would help the 28,000 people who would be affected by this bill. While I am not one of those affected by AB 2569, I feel as though an act against one of us is an act against all of us. We have to stand united, it is only through acting as one that any civil rights movement has gained strength.

But they published a schedule that for the day that was overly aggressive, did not let anyone know they would continue the unheard bills the next day, and did not even mention to the crowded meeting the order of the bills. Five hours of sitting listening to the wheels of the legislature grind, only to not be heard. Having been there before, I was aware that much of the process is decided behind closed doors before the committee meeting, but I was hoping for an impact or cause them to reconsider. I took the day off without pay, took an early morning flight, and rented a car to get from the airport to the capitol. I am not wealthy, I work hard for what little I make, and the legislature in their capricious disregard for the voters, demonstrated how inadequate they are. Throughout the day, those of us in attendance and those watching it by streaming video know the Committee stood up for a variety of causes, protecting us from mylar balloons against the huge outcry of retailers, and preventing a DUI blood THC threshold against the opinion of a highly regarded researcher in the field. They did what seemed right, but failed to do what was right for us because of fear of losing their jobs and out of hate.

Janice cannot do this alone, we must all help. It is through our letters and calls, the legislature responds. If you weren’t there, you would not know that Janice was fighting not only this battle, but also was on Day 2 of treatment for pneumonia. She soldiered through that meeting. Not sure how, as I am healthy and it was a long frustrating day in that meeting room for me. If she can do that to help us, what can we do to help ourselves and help her in this battle? As we move on to the next battle, I hope that everyone that reads this website asks themselves those questions and finds a way, through donations, through standing up at the next Committee meeting, or through an aggressive letter and calling campaign, or whatever you can do to help fight the battle so that we can win the war.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

56 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

They want to get feedback from the victim, yet when the victim tells them something they don’t want to hear, they respond that they are “required to take it into consideration, but they don’t have to abide by it.”

My daughter will be subjected to harassment, bullying, vandalism, etc. all due to the fact that she is related to her abuser, but they don’t care about her. Her abuser went to prison and isn’t eligible for exclusion. But, they only care about her, as long has she tells them what they want to hear.

If the victim is a liar of the whole event, then they are only considering LIES.

BTW We live in a society and not a cubicle. Kids are everywhere! It is so easy to violate just based on the conditions they place on you with violations of probation/parole. I am not a registrant but I feel like one since I have family members on this list. It never ends. When a light is seen down the tunnel it can go dark right away. Allegations can be contrived just based on your status. If you are on a website, you have to duck and cover from just being a target. They win just because you have so little with so much to lose. I am exhausted from all of this. No jobs for them means I have to work harder with less and less. My body is not that strong anymore. I am exhausted from all of this. Sorry I know I am just ranting away but that is how I feel. I appreciate all of you.

[AB2569] recorded 2016-05-11 update
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. Suspense file.

For those who are effect my this new bill here is the status, my laymen understand of what this means is it can be a good thing, however its anyone’s quess until time had passed. It’s a financial and political move, meaning it could die and no politician is associated with the death…

[AB2569] recorded 2016-05-11 update
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. Suspense file.

For those who are effect my this new bill here is the status, my laymen understand of what this means is it can be a good thing, however its anyone’s quess until time has passed. It’s a financial and political move, meaning it could die and no poltician is associated with the death…

With the upcoming election, and the potential for this bill and others to come to a vote later this year and the future, does anyone know the best way to determine best candidates to vote for? Is there a way, this site could post it’s endorsements?

Timmr- I would like to help you with any political agenda to support and education.