A Kansas Supreme Court justice accused his colleagues of denying justice by delaying a series of opinions for eight months after they were decided, a tactic that changed the court’s precedent and accentuated the sway a single justice’s appointment can have. Full Article
Related posts
-
KS: Kansas lawmakers push for HB 2164 law restricting sex offenders from schools
Source: kshb.com 3/25/25 LIBERTY, Mo. — Schools in Kansas and Missouri differ in more ways than... -
KS: Parents outraged after sex offender allowed at Kansas school dance
Source: torontosun.com 2/21/25 Parents in Kansas were outraged to learn a registered sex offender was allowed... -
KS: Kansas Supreme Court affirms police conduct allegedly ‘akin to a psychological rubber hose’
Source: newsfromthestates.com 9/23/24 The Kansas Supreme Court reversed a Saline County judge’s decision to suppress a...
They purposely arrange it so that they don’t set a precedent showing the registry to be punishment. They don’t want a large group to get off the registry all at once.
It’s upsetting to see that they held on to the favorable ruiling in 3 cases so they could release it with the unfavorable ruiling in the fourth. I don’t know if the fourth case was on the horizon eight months earlier when the first 3 were decided. But the fact that one of the justices is calling attention to the issue makes me think that the whole thing was planned.
Tell me how registration is not a punishment, and I’ll show you a liar
If it looks like a duck…
If it walks like a duck…
If it quacks like a duck…
………its a duck.
It’s been a failed scheme that cannot withstand the weight of the Constitution.
Mistreatment of people to double jeopardy, further restraint, & discrimination will come to light for the world to see.