Janice’s Journal: Incrementalism Provides Firm Foundation

I was recently introduced to the term incrementalism in the book, “Notorious RBG”, a biography of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  The term means gradual change and it is the opposite of sudden, radical change.

According to the book, Justice Ginsburg is an advocate of incrementalism because she believes incrementalism can provide a firm foundation for change.  In direct contrast, radical change lacks a firm foundation and can crumble easily when threatened.

After reading this book, I am convinced that incrementalism is the best path for our civil rights movement.  We need to build a firm foundation so that the changes we make will endure.

We started building that foundation in 2012 when we successfully challenged a law in the City of Simi Valley that required registered citizens to post a sign on the front door of their home.  We continued to build that foundation in 2013 when we successfully challenged presence restrictions in the City of Lancaster that prohibited registrants from visiting public places such as parks, swimming pools and libraries as well as private places such as movie theaters and bowling alleys.  We are now adding to that foundation with successful challenges to residency restrictions in cities such as Grover Beach and Arcadia.

In addition to success in the courtroom, we have experienced success in the state legislature where we have stopped bills such as Assembly Bill 201 in 2015 that would have authorized cities to reinstate presence restrictions and Senate Bill 54 in 2016 that would have required registered citizens to prove there is a lack of affordable and available housing in order to obtain relief from residency restrictions.

Each of these successes is an incremental step toward the change that is required.  Each of these successes is another brick in the foundation of our movement.  By building a strong foundation in an incremental fashion, we will reach our goal of protecting the Constitution by restoring the civil rights of more than 100,000 registered citizens and their families.

Today there are incremental steps to be taken both in the state legislature and in the courts.  You are needed in Sacramento to help stop Senate Bill 448 on June 21 and Assembly Bill 2569 on June 28.  You are needed in Oakland to protest the International Megan’s Law on July 27.  Together we can and will achieve our goal.

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

just want to be clear a lot of my post are direct quotes from the website sosen

Unfortunately, incrementalism is the game being played from the other side as well.

When they came for…

And by the time it’s recognized they’ve come for us, there is no one left.

Hopefully “incrementalism” will not be an excuse to advocate for a tiered registry (a “fictitious tiered registry,” as some have humorously described it) that relies on the Static-99R scam. As currently proposed by CASOMB, the tiered registry will throw a lot of people under the bus. Support for a tiered registry will only give credence to special interests’ labeling of alleged high risk sex offenders (HRSO) — and how a group of people, labeled “HRSO” because of a logically flawed and inaccurate actuarial “instrument” — in that people given the HRSO label must be treated worse than alleged low risk sex offenders (and subject to lifetime registration). Segregating HRSO labeled people in a tiered registry achieves two things: 1. It aims to divide and conquer our cause, as it will putt HRSO v. non-HRSO against one another; and 2. It diversifies special interests’ — business, law enforcement, and political — capital invested into selling the sex offender hysteria ostensibly deserved for only HRSOs.