ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (6/12 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

California

Adelanto sued over sex offender residency rules

A federal lawsuit challenges the city’s residency restrictions for registered sex offenders, concluding that the local ordinance’s exclusion zones “cover virtually all residential property within the city” and are more stringent than rules by similar municipalities.

Filed Dec. 8 in U.S. District Court by Sacramento-based attorney Janice Bellucci, the lawsuit claims Adelanto’s local law violates the 14th Amendment, which ensures due process and equal protection of law, and is unconstitutionally vague. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please do not solicit funds
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

hey can you or someone please supply with me with every municipality that still has these restrictions here in cali?? I really need the city’s name and exact code # to include in my motion..thanks

A couple of years ago I had prepared a list of all the cities that Janice had sued for a PowerPoint presentation, but have since lost track myself. I think it would be an excellent resource myself. Imagine every case that CA RSOL / ACSOL had been involved with, including all court PDF’s, posted on this site. It would be an inspiration and template for lawyers and other legal professionals for how to handle such lawsuits all over the country!

It should also be noted that CA RSOL / ACSOL has the unique designation of having cases in all four California Circuit federal courts at the same time. The only case that has been lost so far is the IML case where the passport scarlet letter code was designated to be included for all registrants, but that was a preemptive strike that is much harder to prevent than a situation with actual damages. Now it will take individuals whom were actually harmed by the scarlet letter that will render a future challenge easier to win, a sad but unavoidable consequence.

Unfortunately, not many, if any, are anxious to be the sacrificial lambs on this one.

I’ll do it! “Uniquely identify” my passport. I’ll gladly be the plaintiff in a lawsuit against these fascist bastards!
Let’s “Make America great again” by honoring the words and intent of our United States Constitution!

I think the thousands made homeless and conseqently many probation and parole officers, not to mention the CASOMB coming out against the residency restriction has much to do with the success of these lawsuits.
The case against IML will be boosted if a comparable societal disruption is shown, and some in authority itself document that adverse consequenses. Unfortunately, almost no decision maker cares if we lose out on a vacation or business oportunity due to travel regulations. There might be a few who hopefully have sons or daughters, parents or close friends affected by IML and see things differently.

What I don’t understand is how people can’t see that societal disruption is inherent. Why do people seem to think that these rules only effect some random, nameless, faceless person who really deserves it? All of these things ripple outward, ultimately effecting everybody in more or less direct ways. Just look at it fiscally: from the Politicians piling on the glut of new rules, all of the new necessary enforcement measures, manpower, work hours, hassle for employers, lost revenue, lost taxes, etc. etc.. I cannot help but think that harassment is unbelievably expensive.

Beautifully worded: “The ordinance’s restrictions are an ‘arbitrary, politically motivated act imposed by a local government in response to popular sentiments,’ the lawsuit reads, ‘based upon misinformation, which seeks retribution against Registrants who constitute a socially outcast minority.’ ”

Now if only the same argument can be said about IML…

I agree!

Sounds like the Perfect Grounds for a Lawsuit to me.

can you please post a link to the brief??? thanks

Excellent. Hello everybody.!
And all registered should be enjoined in lawsuit as the exclusion pretty much effects a majority registered.
City council take the time to read the Constitution at your lunch break.
Amazing.

You know how perfect people think. They make their own rules and Fk the Constitution.( Not anymore folks, meet the ACSOL and have a crappy day!)

First, who on earth lives in Adelanto? This is in the middle of the desert? Yet, we have people just wanting to live a peaceful life!

Isn’t this akin to all those small towns in Texas, believing they can supersede state law?

I don’t have any sort of personal experience with these types of laws. Is this a situation where parents would be forced to either send a registrant child away to be homeless or sell their home and move? Would a family have to pull the kids out of school and relocate? With all of the things that our family has gone through, I still can’t imagine a forced frogmarch out of town.

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.