ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


CT: Legislator wants “johns” to face felony charge, register as sex offenders

Advocates for human trafficking victims hope to use momentum from last legislative session to target those who pay for sex. Lawmakers and nonprofits have been pushing for changes in the law, including more leniency for prostitutes and stiffer penalties for their customers.

Rep. Liz Linehan, D-Cheshire, is behind a bill that would make solicitation of a prostitute a felony and require those convicted to register as a sex offender. The offense is currently a misdemeanor, even when a minor is involved. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Because there are not nearly enough people on the registry??? Sure, go ahead because many of these “Johns” are those who are in public office at the local, state, and federal levels.

Only “John” the plumber gets the honor of being internet famous, Senator “John” gets a slap on the wrist.

So if those “Johns” become sex offenders under the law in CT, what happens when they move to a state like Nevada where prostitution is legal? Do they still have to register as sex offenders?

That is an extremely salient point about how the registrant can morph into virtually any lawmaker’s poster child for their sick legislation. The fact that the crime in the originating state is actually not a crime in the receiving state seems to weigh in on the side of the registrant (or potential registrant)

Nevada requires ex-felons of any class to register. If the originating state is requiring registration, and likely publication based on a misdemeanor, it really starts to unravel and show the
law for the rube-goldberg mechanism it has been since inception. Pardon my grammar, but I think
you have touched on extremely important point here.

Where is justice any where in this array of sick legislation and where is the reprimand for the legislators who willfully violate the constitution?

Here’s another clue that love for government is misplaced. Anytime, ANYTIME you see a government official clammering on about the new buzzword, be afraid….

I wouldn’t be so trusting of these organizations that push these buzzwords either. Soros and elites like him, support or found some of these groups to push other agendas. Research.

Well, let me recommend this! Prostitition would disappear if you required pristitutes to register. I’ve came across sites like Eros-la, cityvibe and bsckpage. I was shocked by the filthy photos they post online? It’s terrible. Yet, they continue to operate day after day? If the punishment would be to register, this would disappear!

So here’s analogy…

The individualized drug purchaser gets penalized more than the drug dealer. Drug dealer just gets a misdemeanor.

Is that where this is going? Crazy thought.

I’ve never come across these sites, so I will take your word they are out there and assume they are prostitution sites; nonetheless, registration has no positive effect on preventing sex crimes.

Good. Do it.

The more people on the list the better.

good analogy new person…this is just another war on citizens who don’t fit the moral mold of the puritans in this country…prohibition didn’t work, the war on drugs hasn’t worked and this war on sexual behavior is not going to work…I guess CT legislators better allocate money for all the new prisons their going to have to build to house all the johns..oh wat they can just fill the void all the released drug offenders have left open….watch cops and I would say 99% of those arrested are drug or sex related….cops might actually have to prevent real crimes and have to face real criminals if they didn’t have all these non dangerous non victim crimes that are just people choosing to do what their doing…article states if there is no demand ( no johns) the there will be no supply…how’s that worked out with drugs and alcohol?

‘prohibition didn’t work, the war on drugs hasn’t worked and this war on sexual behavior is not going to work’

Back then it might’ve been about stopping something but I think we live in slightly different times from prohibition days. Meaning, they’re not out to win anything. It’s about controlling a group of people and keeping their governmental machine powered. All “war on” policies are that way.

Some already do in California

I had a issue many years ago. I’ve since moved on. I participate in a particular sport and get a NORMAL massage periodically. The problem is that it’s difficult to find s legitimate place. I’m appalled. I’ve gotten a massage and the man in the other room is moaning? The woman giving me the massage then began touching me innapropriately? Now, if I did that, I would (I already am) get arrested! In summary, the laws on prostitition should be harsher

What I find is funny is the founder of CT was named Thomas Hooker

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x