ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (11/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


General News

SCOTUS: Court may strike law barring sex offenders from social media

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared likely Monday to strike down a North Carolina law that prohibits sex offenders from using Facebook and other social networking sites.

At least five justices suggested during argument that they would rule for North Carolina resident Lester Packingham Jr. He was convicted of violating a 2008 law aimed at keeping sex offenders off internet sites children might use. Packingham used Facebook to boast about beating a traffic ticket.

The state’s lawyer said the law deals with the virtual world in the same way that states keep sex offenders out of playgrounds and other places children visit. But several justices said the law was so broad that it could violate free-speech rights, even of people convicted of sex crimes. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Please make all future comments on the subject here.
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Unfortunately according to our president, The Washington Post only publishes “fake news”.

Another analysis from Winter White House country (err, Southern White House – would not want to restrict my tax payer funded vacations to one season):

How Trump’s Twitter use could help bring down NC sex offender law–politics/how-trump-twitter-use-could-help-bring-down-sex-offender-law/


Just a thought, if they are still avoiding revisiting the whole argument about whether or not registration is punishment, can they really make any other decision besides allowing us on social media?

Remember that reality and fairness have nothing to do with the legal system or American values for that matter.

So sure they can easily tell us all to F off and as that is the usual result. It is insane not to expect the same results when we have seen the same set of circumstances over and over and over…

Unfortunately, none of this prohibits companies from establishing “terms of service” that ban registered citizens… The state can’t ban access, but a “private” actor can.

Not good

ha ha ha

Trump’s usage of twitter to condemn registrants from using twitter. How exactly are registrants to know the President was doing this without a twitter account?! Rich, isn’t it?

Sttt and wrong yes it doesn’t address private companies however the argument could still be made against a private company where is the basis for it plus a business cannot discriminate unless they have proof that you were being disruptive and they would not be able to provide any proof that Bending see offender would be disturbing are harming their business by preying on minors not to mention the argument to be made that the private companies are not higher than states that if the states can’t do it neither can a private company do it

Right, imagine ATT, Verizon, Sprint banning one from using the phone, because of being a registrant.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x