CT: Lawmakers consider requiring juveniles to register as sex offenders

Lawmakers are considering a bill that would require juveniles convicted of sexual offenses to register as sex offenders.

Judiciary Committee co-chairman Rep. William Tong, D-Stamford, said members of the committee believe sexual assault is just as serious when the offense is committed by someone under the age of 18. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

They fail to mention this overcomes a big hurdle towards becoming AWA compliant. Here in Nebraska back in 2009 our then Attorney General, Jon Bruning, tried to get us AWA compliant. But the Juvenille issue stopped him, and holds to this day. Be careful, Connecticut !

‘“They’re violent crimes…and they create a lifetime culture of fear (for victims),” Tong said after a public hearing Friday.’
This statement about the unmitigable effects of sex crimes (and apparently only sex crimes) is one of the three myths that keep registration laws going as popular social policy. One of the other heads on this Cerberus like beast is the myth of “frightening and high” reoffense rates. That head is being muzzled by facts right now. The second myth is still going strong, unfortunately. Noone wishes to attack that one, because it makes one appear anti victim. The third myth is that registration works to reduce the rate of victmization. That is also under attack at present. Until these three heads (myths) are subdued by facts, registration will continue, and registrants will be kept in this dark underworld of endless punishment.

Then you charge the teen as an adult so they fall under the adult crime guidelines if you feel this strongly about it, but leave those who are 17 and under alone if you are not going to do that. They do that with other crimes considered “adult”. There is latitude here that needs to be considered. We treat people under 18 as adults and minors simultaneously that it is crazy how the law can keep anything straight.

The other side is shouldn’t you be understanding why a 14 year old boy was acting in such a manner? You want to tar and feather him without understanding what precipitated the actions, e.g. was he the target of someone he knew or trusted earlier in his life, etc? What sort of help does he need to be a productive person in life? All three of these young people have avenues to help them get through life and this instance without carrying around society’s stigmas.

CT – NY’s little sibling when it comes to this type of thing….