WI: Sex offender board aims ‘never to make a mistake’

The city’s sex offender residency ordinance is 10 years old this spring. Passed in 2007, it forbids convicted sex offenders from moving to within 1,500 feet of any place where children are likely to gather. The restriction essentially closes off most affordable residential areas of the city to convicted sex offenders who didn’t already live there before the ordinance was passed.

But Green Bay’s ordinance, unlike most of the other 175 ordinances placing housing restrictions on sex offenders in communities throughout the state, provides one major exception: Any sex offender may seek an exemption by taking his or her case to a five-person board, whose citizen members are appointed by the mayor. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

““We want to be able to know where THESE people are.”

These people? Really? Sounds like a blatant attempt at dehumanization.

Great. So while keeping “tabs” on “those” people, the cops can take credit for “safeguarding” children and look good while doing relatively nothing. Got it.

Sounds like fraud to me.

Hmmmm, this “never to make mistake” if this is talking about the system of sex offender registry, personifies hypocrisy and ignorance.

This is a stupid goal…human beings are always making mistakes…and just what is a mistake? The definition of child has been so tortured that it now includes a 17 year old mother of two. Likewise consent. Real children and violence or active coercion I understand…otherwise not so much.


Is there also a board to determine whether former murderers, burglars, muggers, drunk drivers, domestic abusers, arsonists, scam artists, swindlers, and other ne’er-do-wells can enjoy the pleasures of living in Green Bay, Wisconsin?

How can such people continue to lie and create all kinds of fallacies about how the sex offender registry is working effectively, protects children, requiring mandatory public notification of registrants, and that the system never makes mistakes?

The very second someone not previously convicted who lives in the “safety zone” offended and is convicted, the City of Green Bay will have to admit it made a mistake.

Children are not safe in safety zones. We just need to ensure that that victim who went unprotected confronts the City and asks them why they failed to protect him from his mother the offender.