OH: Committee recommends eliminating residency restrictions for sex offenders

A proposed change to Ohio’s Criminal Code could eliminate residency restrictions for sex offenders.

The Criminal Justice Recodification Committee has finished reviewing Ohio’s extensive criminal code after two years. However, not everyone agrees with some of its recommendations. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Director of government affairs for the Fraternal Order of Police, Michael Weinman, said, “From a police perspective you’re getting the potential offenders away from those victims.”

If that’s truly the rational, then logic demands that convicted drug dealers and DUI drivers should have identical residency restrictions.
A more intelligent voice:
State Public Defender and vice chair of the Criminal Justice Recodification Committee Tim Young said “I want our government to spend money on things that are effective and if we’re spending money on this and we spend millions on this, on enforcing these restrictions, on enforcing registration requirements …. I know that means we’re taking money away from actually making my children safe.” 👍

Go figure that law enforcement is in favor of the residence restrictions?! When you have a public policy that just doesn’t work and costs a lot of money to implement of course they are in favor of it because it justifies their jobs!

Seems we’ve entered an era where the arguments against residency and other restrictions is now being argued in such a way that says” the data doesn’t support your conclusion.” It’s becoming data driven! It’s where we need to be!

They are wasting resources and a whole lot of money monitoring me. I am NOT going to reoffend. For what 15 years in prison? My orig crime wasn’t a pleasure like people may think.

What a huge, wonderful step in the right direction! Incredible.

There’s little surprise that LEOs want the status quo. That’s where they feel the most comfortable: with what they know. They are not agents of change, their role is to maintain. They also, typically, don’t seem to dig deeper into issues to develop an informed opinion. They just follow orders. I don’t recall ever hearing a LEO saying a law should be abolished. They love laws, they live through laws.

The whole registry is stupid. Its all about money. Making someone register their information is not going to stop them from re offending if that’s what they want to do. Some people on the registry are dangerous and are predators therefore they should be handled accordingly. Most people on the registry are not predators, didn’t even rape someone, and was falsely convicted. People do lie out of spite. Making someone stay 1000 feet away from a place doesn’t mean they can’t get there and stand there all day if they wanted to. smh