ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021

National

House Passes Bill That Could Have Teens Facing 15 Years For Trying To Sext

[Forbes]

In Washington as in life, certain roads may be paved with good intentions, but critics of a purportedly well-meaning new bill warn it would lead to major suffering for the very people it’s meant to protect: U.S. teenagers.

Last week, the House of Representatives approved H.R.1761, also known as the “Protecting Against Child Exploitation Act of 2017,” which builds on current law that makes teen-to-teen sexting a crime. Reportedly aimed at closing “loopholes” in child pornography legislation, the bill received support from all but two Republican congressmen, Reps. Justin Amash of Michigan and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who voted against the bill along with 53 democrats.

Under the present law, any individual who violates its terms or conspires to do “shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 15 years nor more than 30 years.” Second-time offenders, meanwhile, or those that have previously been convicted of related or (in some cases) arguably unrelated offenses under federal and/or military rules, would be fined and imprisoned “for not less than 25 years nor more than 50 years” under the law. Third-time offenders would be fined and imprisoned for “not less than 35 years nor more than life.”

Read more

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If this bill passes Congress, we can only hope that sponsor Rep Mike Johnson has teenagers who get charged with sexting under federal law. It will take nothing but his children being charged for him to really understand. Sharia law is coming…..the Christian kind.

Wake up America!

Does this go the Senate next for processing? If so, maybe they can stop this before it goes any further.

With SCOTUS ignoring Karsjens and Snyder, these laws are going to keep springing up. In some ways I say, “good,” the more the merrier. The easier it is to get on the registry, the more people will be personally affected or know someone who’s on it. If we cannot escape the pain, then let’s get EVERYONE in on it, rendering it worthless.

A couple years ago Colorado had a case with nearly the entire high school being charged with Sexting. The charges were all ultimately dropped after the scope widened so much and the parents nearly rioted. I have zero illusions that had the scope remained small to the initial students that they’d be prosecuted and registered. You’re right that it’ll take nearly everyone being effected one way or another for things to really change. And sadly (for the country), we’re well on our way to that.

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2015/1209/351-explicit-photos-in-Colorado-sexting-case-No-charges-against-students

This is a DISGRACE to the United States. Rep. Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) is not only UNFIT for office by proposing such trash, but he is aiming to get as many young people behind bars as possible, further expanding the Prison Machine. We need to Civilly Commit mental cases like him, as soon as possible. How does such a inhumane being even get into office? 15 years in prison for teens even proposing to sext to each other? Jesus Christ. Nazi Germany and Hitler would be proud of you Representative Mike Johnson, you disgusting and misguided soul. Hopefully when people in… Read more »

I am not sure what this has to do with the Commerce Clause as sexting has nothing to do with commerce, or economic gain between the States

The Commerce Clause has been the go-to passage in the Constitution to justify the federal government regulating every aspect of our lives.

“Commerce, Commerce, Everywhere: The Uses and Abuses of the Commerce Clause”

http://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/commerce-commerce-everywhere-the-uses-and-abuses-the-commerce-clause

@ Timmy: 1. I would guess that sending or receiving lewd images violates FCC telecommunication regulations. 2. If those images are sent over State lines, that probably violates inter-State “commerce” laws (even if nothing is actually bought or sold). 3. It would probably also violate U.S. Postal Service regulations (not kidding).

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.