IN: Sex offender class for prisoners violates Constitution, judge rules


A federal judge has ruled that Indiana’s mandated sex offender classes for prisoners who oppose them violates the constitutional right to be free from self-incrimination.

The Sept. 28 ruling in the class-action lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Indiana will affect all convicted, incarcerated sex offenders who opt out of the Indiana Sex Offender Monitoring and Management, or SOMM, program. Three of the plaintiffs will be eligible for release from prison.

The Indiana attorney general’s office has filed an emergency request to temporarily halt the case pending an appeal, saying the decision could put the public at risk by putting convicted sex offenders back on the streets.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“The Indiana attorney general’s office has filed an emergency request to temporarily halt the case pending an appeal, saying the decision could put the public at risk by putting convicted sex offenders back on the streets.”

How is letting them out of prison somehow more dangerous than letting other people out who had a victim? After all, when its not a problem to let a guy out who bashed someone over the head to take their money (possibly killing them) then why should the prosecutor complain because of a sex offense?

“the consequence of which greatly outweighs the harm to the limited persons affected by the Judgment,” wrote Jonathan P. Nagy, deputy attorney general.

“If the Court’s Judgment is not stayed pending appeal, various convicted sex offenders, including three of the class representatives, are eligible for immediate release.”

The case is expected to be appealed to the 7th District Court of Appeals in Chicago.

Let Heaven & Earth bear witness to the Evil (Want) that the Wicked Servant Attorney General Curtis Hill of Indiana (e.g. the Land of Indians) runs to commit against The Right & Titles of The Citizens of the U.S.A.

I speak a True Song

As Yehovah Lives, so should we

I hate to break it to them but, barring a life sentence, at some point convicted sex offenders WILL be back on the street, regardless any hoops the State tries to impose while incarcerated. It’s called completion of a sentence (i.e. one’s debt to society). I really like that the judge said the State was overstepping its penalizing authority by…whoops…singling out sex offenders over “any other convicted prisoner.” Sorry, Indiana, but the sex offense convicts have equal rights to others–until they are released from prison, and have to bend under the onus of the myriad “regulations” that carry felony penalties.