MA: ‘Change of culture and mindset’ needed at Sex Offender Registry Board after probe finds no current addresses for 1,769 sex offenders, state auditor says

Massachusetts Auditor Suzanne Bump on Tuesday criticized the Sex Offender Registry Board for what she described as a culture of passivity in tracking sex offenders, after an audit found the board did not have a current address for more than 1,700 offenders. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

17hundred. 17thousand. Doesn’t matter. “The Registry” does NOT lower the number of sex crimes committed. Doesn’t matter if the entire human population’s address and picture and vehicle reg etc, etc was listed, or if Nobody was ever listed again. The number of sex crimes will be the same, unfortunately. Nice try though. Now let’s make some progress in the fight against sex abuse, using facts, and professionals, not political pander.

The tracking and monitoring of sex offenders is pointless because it’s a waste of time, money, and lives of many people that are on the registry that are struggling to live their lives everyday. The sex offender tracking and monitoring system is not designed for safety for the public which we all like to easily believe, it was meant for humiliation, deprivation, isolation, and denial of human rights like what we witness the situation in Florida when registrants were denied shelter and refuge from the hurricane just because of their criminal past. And there are maniacs that are using the system to commit harm while knowing that they are commiting a crime, and there is a high recidivism of vigilante violence against people on the registry.

Yeah, the change of culture needed is the realization that not knowing where they are has had zero impact on anything. But we wouldn’t want to admit that fact, would we?

Wait.

If this is true…isn’t someone going to ring the bell and bring up the FACT? The FACT that if there are all these raging sex fiends running around unchecked, that means there must be a huge spike in sex offenses, right? I mean, tracking is so effective…

“It has a statutory responsibility to ensure that information is kept up to date, accurate and secure.”

^It doesn’t MATTER if the information is current, complete or accurate, Megan’s Law (community notification or whatever) simply will NOT curtail, thwart or prevent ANYTHING.

“Rep. David Vieira, R-Falmouth, suggested that lawmakers look at their ability to withhold licenses, deny public benefits and even freeze bank accounts and credit cards of sex offenders “until you show up and tell us where you are.”

^ What in the actual HELL!? This idiot is actually serious!

And so how many reoffended when they weren’t being monitored? It seems they left that tid-bit out.