ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021


Simi Valley Formally Notifies Registrants of Repealed Halloween Ordinance

The City of Simi Valley has formally notified registrants in that city that they are no longer required to post a sign on the front door of their home on Halloween and are allowed to decorate their homes as well as answer their door to children. According to the letter dated October 18, these changes are the result of a decision made on October 16 by the Simi Valley City Council to repeal its Halloween ordinance which was adopted in 2012.

The Simi Valley letter did not make reference to the two federal lawsuits filed in 2012 and 2017 which challenged the city’s Halloween ordinance. However, the City agreed to send the letters to registrants in a settlement agreement reached with a registrant and his family who live in Simi Valley. Another provision in that agreement requires the Simi Valley City Police Department to create and distribute internally a memo regarding the City Council’s decision to repeal the Halloween ordinance.

“We commend the City of Simi Valley for honoring this year’s settlement agreement,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “We will monitor the actions of the Simi Valley Police Department this year and in the future to ensure that their actions are also consistent with that agreement.”

According to a plaintiff in the 2017 lawsuit, two Simi Valley police officers handed him a flier last month and told him that he must comply with the requirements of the city’s Halloween ordinance. Two city officials later told the media that compliance with the ordinance was voluntary, however, the language of the flier did not include a statement that compliance was voluntary. In addition, the City of Simi Valley formally agreed in a 2013 settlement agreement, after being sued in federal court, that the city would not enforce its Halloween ordinance.

Letter to Registrants (pdf)

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nice work!



Janice, you are an absolute saint. I don’t live in Simi, but since I’m there often and live just over the hill in the SFV, this hits close to home. I’m happy that my RC brethren are getting some relief.

I’m still waiting for them to notify us and admit they were wrong about everything.

Yes, Janice is indeed a saint. Along with Chance and everyone who works tirelessly for the RSOL cause.

ThankYouThankYouThankYou!!!! Let them tell some other group of felons that they can do this or that and they can’t go here or there AFTER Their Sentence Has Been Satisfied. Grrrr

Congratulations, wonderful work. I would like to read the letter. Did ACSOL write the letter? The criminal regime surely couldn’t be trusted to write it.

The letter should not have told the Registered people what they could do. It should have said something simply along the lines that the criminal regime would treat them as the citizens that they are and not apply special harassment to them.

ACSOL, thank you for posting the letter (hope I didn’t miss seeing that link before!). It is very hard for me to believe that the criminal regime wrote the letter since it was succinct, factual, and did not contain any snide comments or lies about public safety and such. I’m very skeptical that such a letter is within their capabilities.

People need to stay vigilant because this criminal regime will be committing their next crimes soon enough.

Maybe you can post a copy here or direct where we can see it.

There is link to copy of letter above just under article. Link is blue.

Don’t worry folks, your kids are safe, as long as those nasty, horrific, Tier 3’s are kicked in the teeth on a daily basis for the rest of their lives, Halloween can go on.

@ Matt ,,,,, ,, ,, it really sucks bro , hell I don’t feel safe even thinking about going out on Halloween , and it my favorite time of year , so I guess I will sit home and watch movies , good luck to everyone and have the best Halloween you can create for you and yours , a bunch of Chinese food sounds great

Thanks you Janice. They can’t throw rocks at my door now (symbolic memories of my past). I always turned off my lights and tuned out when Halloween came around. It was a silly insult to me.

Now if we can get this for Los Angeles County, that would be even better.

I just got a call from my local police station stating unless I’m on parole or its stated in my probation terms then they will not be enforcing their Halloween ordinance. He said specifically this was due to the recent ruling in Simi. Everyone should call their specific station to see how they will enforce if they do have Halloween ordinances. Thank you Janice as your efforts have trickled down to all cities.

@Time to Fight – Thank you for the good news! Glad to learn that your city educated itself without the need to be sued in federal court.

They won’t enforce it now for how long until another administration comes in whether it is elected or otherwise, e.g. hired, then they will try to enforce it. They should just repeal it and be done with it, not selectively not enforce it. It is elected official laziness.

This is Great News!

I for one am so tired of the production of fear and hysteria for something that has never even happened.
There is not literally one case of child abduction or child rape during Halloween it is a manufactured fear that is only to fuel the Hate and fear.
There are several articles that challenge the nonsense.

Educate not Hate

Have a Happy and Safe Halloween Everyone.

I understand that the rules still apply to those on parole. Perhaps the next step is to revise the CDCR law so that only those with crimes/alleged crimes against children must comply . As an example, young college men who were convicted following a drunken, non-underage he said-she said incident pose a threat to children???

Edie,are you at some higher scale than everyone else?

No, I’m not. It was a poor choice of words on my part. My apologies. NOBODY should be subjected to these draconian rules.

This Letter to the Editor of the Simi Valley Acorn is a classic…. sadly there is no way to comment.


@A. Corn

Actually, you can write a reply letter to the editor with an opposing view for publishing. Maybe they will or not, but cannot say you did not try.

I wonder if this person sucks children in and sends them back out as different people…..what movie is he watching to get these ideas anyway?

Appropriate name for their newspaper, since they all seem to be a bunch of nuts….and, like an oak, slow to change or grow.

When the city not having you post a sign saying you are a monster is considered a victory, consider the war lost.

@Counting the days:
If not a victory, what would you call it? A loss? Neutral? To think overturning a law that burdens RCs is anything but a victory is beyond me and, frankly, myopic. Forcing the Government to retreat in any manner is, to me, a victory. Today it’s a sign; tomorrow it’s safety zones; the day after that it’s residency restrictions. Wars are won through battles large and small. The sign win was a small battle in the greater war.
Again, what would you call it when that happens (generically, not this law per se)?

Or a more simple way to put it: The govt FORCING you to put up a sign is a loss, FORCING them to abolish that law is a victory

So giving a person doing a life sentence an extra pack of smokes makes him happy, but doesn’t cost anyone else a thing, and he’s still doing life.
Sorry, but I have lost too much to consider anything short of total system destruction a victory. I don’t wag my tail for scraps from the table that were going to go in the garbage anyway!

Poor analogy, since someone in prison has demonstrably fewer rights than someone who is not incarcerated. Last I checked, access to cigarettes is not a right, regardless upon which side of the razor wire one is standing. It’s a privilege granted, not a right retained. I’ll take the regaining of my rights, tyvm. I am quite sure there would be a very long line of people in prison who would be willing to trade places with any of us. Heck, who on here who has been in prison would opt for being in prison and not registered over being out… Read more »

They took off my original comment, but it had to do with you having self intercourse.

@Counting the days:
And your statement says volumes about you..especially since you felt it warranted a second go-round after it was initially rejected. Anger issues, perhaps?

But to the point…if it’s not a gain, then what is it? The only other options are neutral or loss.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x