ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021

California

Assembly Bill to Disenfranchise Coalinga Patients

[ACSOL]

Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula (Democrat, Fresno) has introduced a bill (AB 2839) that would disenfranchise patients at Coalinga State Hospital, including patients that recently defeated a proposed tax increase attempted by the City of Coalinga.  The district represented by Assemblyman Arambula includes both Coalinga State Hospital as well as the City of Coalinga. 

The proposed bill, if passed, would require anyone adjudicated as a “sexually violent predator” (SVP) and committed to the custody of the State Department of Hospitals for “an indeterminate term” to vote at their “last known address.”  Because individuals who are adjudicated as SVP’s were imprisoned prior to their adjudication, these individuals would be required to vote at the prison where they previously resided.

“Most individuals adjudicated as SVP’s have little or no chance to be released from Coalinga State Hospital,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “Therefore, they should be allowed to continue to vote where they actually live which is in the City of Coalinga.”

Following their unsuccessful attempt to increase taxes, the City of Coalinga sued Fresno County in an attempt to negate the votes cast in that election by patients at Coalinga State Hospital.  A motion to intervene in the case has been filed by a group of Coalinga patients and a hearing on that motion will be heard on March 7.

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Seems to me this could be beat on constitutional grounds should this bill ever come into effect; maybe not in California though. I’m a-political, yet it never ceases to amaze me how these democrats and liberals disregard our constitution and the law when they din’t like it or it get’s in their way, then willingly attack it (verbally or otherwise) to try to get their way.

It’s not only Democrats, but also Republicans. The City of Coalinga council is mostly Republican.

@The Static-99R Is A Scam; This is true what you say. I just named that one party because it is a member of that particular party that is leading the charge to disenfranchise these American citizens.

It is delusional to suggest that it is Democrats who are leading the charge to disenfranchise sex offenders. I won’t carry water for either party as I have stated numerous times on this forum, but it is factually untrue that Democrats are more likely to further marginalize “sex offenders,” in general, or to disenfranchise them vis-a-vis voting rights, in particular than Republicans. This distinction clearly goes to Republicans. In this case, we have a Democrat legislator from a particularly conservative rural county who colluded with Republicans from his district to disenfranchise civil detainees. As far as threats to voting rights… Read more »

Ah, gotcha. Makes sense.

Wow. Simply wow. So much for being “free citizens.” So if/when they are required to vote where they “live”, will they be required to register an address there too?

Were I the CSH hospatients, I would let my voter registration expire, then sign up again. What utility bill, DL, or other ID will they have showing the supposed residence outside CSH? None. Good luck making that work, Legislature.

This stinks of corruption like nobody’s business. Also, the courts look very intensely at laws affecting voting. It has a distinct odor of a Bill of Attainder.

Exactly.

It is by any definition a “Bill of Attainder” and passes every test of it with ease.

If the city is so negatively impacted by them, how about actually treating and releasing many of them?

Chris,
I agree with you. Except that the city is getting so much revenue from the hospital and the prison next door. I read that those “free” citizens are charged $250K to the state each year every year they are incarcerated in the hospital. That is the main reason why they are not released.

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.