NJ: The disappeared defy good Megan’s Law record | Editorial

The alliterative term “active absconders” has a nice ring to it, but those to whom the State of New Jersey applies the term are likely to be anything but nice.

They’re serious sex offenders who have disappeared without a trace after initial registration under New Jersey’s first-in-the-nation Megan’s Law, based on classifications that are supposed to follow them for life. Full Article

Related

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2018/01/have_you_seen_these_registered_sex_offenders_polic.html

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“whom officials fear could become recidivists who repeat horrific crimes”

Good God, the fear mongering in this article. It’s always assumed that an absconder must have nefarious intentions, when more than likely, they absconded for reasons we can all relate to. A man (especially a free citizen who has supposedly paid his debt to society) can only take so much.

Maybe I will stop registering. I guess that means I might reoffend? What a cruel joke. Let’s make a registry for convicted politicians. They hurt tens of thousands of children by STEALING their parents tax money thus depriving and causing pain and humiliation. But the judges (& D.A.’s) would just dismiss or lower the charges so registering would not be required. Hahahahahahahaha..

Talk about fear mongering – who actually moves to new jersey???

The article does point out some good points about reintegrating people into society. At least they mentioned both sides of societies views. I was convicted in NJ and it’s not the worst place to have to register (as a level I anyway). I wasn’t on the public registry and therefore didn’t have too many issues with vigilantes or being called out by nosy neighbors. I found employment within 2 weeks of getting out of incarceration and lived mostly in peace in NJ for 11 years. The PO’s were something else though; way too much biased opinions. It wasn’t until I moved to Georgia, where I got placed on the public registry, that employment and ignorant people became a problem (fellow employees complaining to HR, neighbors threatening me, countless job applications being denied, etc.). On the other hand, the PO’s in the county I live are somewhat fair in their interactions with me. All that said, it does suck to be on the registry, so I can understand why someone would abscond and it’s not necessarily to re-offend.