ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


WV: State Supreme Court Rules Probation Internet Restrictions Violate First Amendment

[UPDATED LINKS 3/20/18] []

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has ruled that completely restricting a person’s access to the internet as a condition of their parole from prison is a violation of the First Amendment.

“Like the statute in Packingham, Mr. Ross’s condition of parole ‘bars access to…sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge,’” the decision states.

Read more


Supreme Court says restricting internet access while on parole violates First Amendment [ 3/19/18]


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Great news! Now, about that whole registry… Come on, Judges. Let’s not be afraid to do the morally and scientifically proven right thing.

And this gem from the article:
In December 2014, Ross’s parole officer learned that M.W. had a computer and Ross was arrested and returned to custody for violating the conditions of his parole, even though no forensic analysis of the computer was done to determine whether Ross had used the computer or had otherwise logged on to the internet during his parole.

Nice that no evidence is needed to send someone back to jail.

Told you so. Now to get the judges to throw people into jail for violating the rights of fellow citizens. Lawsuits are not enough.

thats like telling a 290 (CA) he cant drive while on parole… its basically a necessity esp if you are rural….. anyways I wasnt supposed to be on the internet when i was on parole… I was anyways, there are MANY reasons you HAVE to be.. banking, dmv renewals, car insurance, Email that has to do with all of the above, paperless statements, forms for lawsuits, to pay bills (like a traffic ticket lol) A zillion reasons,,, its cause THEY like to be in CONTROL, ohhh yea you ‘could be’ looking at porn or doing a hookup… but you cant… Read more »

Bit by bit, the cookie crumbles. This seems like a further extension of the Packingham win. I guess the right strategy all along was to chip-away at the laws until we get to the ‘Core’. I’m anticipating a lawsuit in the near future that will take the 6th Court Circuit win, calling the registry “Punitive”, and further eroding the registry’s ‘tentacles’.

Hmmm….it’s a shame this wasn’t done a few years ago when I was on parole. One of my restrictions was no internet access.

One of the guys in my rehab group just a few years ago violated his probation for being on Facebook. Nothing he actually did was wrong. He was just on it. He even had his IRA with him as he thought he understood his terms.

I had the same condition, I was on the internet anyways lol

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x