Victims’ advocate wants unlimited Facebook access — does that apply to all?

[ 6/21/18]

By Sandy . . . I read with interest “Facebook block riles advocates of sex crime survivors.” Racheal Gonzales of Albuquerque, New Mexico, has posited an interesting position: Governmental officials and representatives should not be able to block constituents who disagree with them on their Facebook pages because it prohibits the critics’ ability to make their positions known and exercise their right to free speech.

Emboldened by a ruling that said our president could not do that, Ms. Gonzales says she wants this policy extended to all.

NARSOL agrees.

Ms. Gonzales may be unaware, although I doubt it, that Facebook itself blocks those who are on a sexual offense registry from using its services. These citizens are prohibited not only from expressing their own political views via this medium but are also refused the ability to read the opinion of others. Does Ms. Gonzales find this practice equally reprehensible? Will she speak up for the rights of all to have the same access to their elected officials for which she advocates for survivors of assault?

What if Facebook denounced its policy of blocking its services from citizens who are on sexual offense registries? Does Ms. Gonzales believe that they should have equal access to the Facebook pages of the representatives of their government in order to advocate against laws with which they disagree?

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Maybe there is a way to create a social media that belongs to the people. We have got to get the public square out of the billionare’s private mansion.

On Thursday, Gonzales filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office against Roybal Caballero and another candidate.

If she can file a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office against facebook can we?

I don’t know why anyone would want to use FacedBook anyway. I don’t care what anyone says, someone who can publicly lie as much as Zuckerberg has is clearly not honest by nature. They are more likely to be the kind of person to, I don’t know, steal an idea for a “social networking” website, then use said website to consume as much personal data it can, for free, and sell it to the highest bidder. Society is better off without it.

Ok so here is my question, Google+ doesn’t seem to have an RSO block. Why not just use that instead?

Well, it hasn’t caught on. I had thought that they discontinued it altogether but apparently they haven’t. I see that I still have an account there but there’s been no activity. They would have a hard time terminating you since individuals also have Gmail accounts. Would they terminate their Gmail accounts, too if they implemented a “no sex-offenders” policy? That starts getting sticky for them, I think.

as for FB yea they suck, I really do NOT use them but sometimes you NEED a FB to look at articles…/postings so yea… NOW HEAR THIS ZUCKERBERG and FB STAFF: Im a RSO/290, and I HAVE A FB… UNDER A FAKE NAME !!! Simple !!

I also did it with that same street thing… NEXTDOOR… easy to sign up a fake account… !

Did Ms. Gonzales replied to this article?