ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: July 20 – Berkeley, August 17 – San Diego, September 21 – Phone meeting details

Emotional Support Group Meetings: Los Angeles – July 27

International

South Africa: Call for sex offenders’ list to be made public

[www.iol.co.za – 1/24/19]

DURBAN – Child rights organisation Save the Children has launched an online petition calling on Police Minister Bheki Cele to make the National Registrar for Sex Offenders (NSRO) public.

The NSRO is not available to the general public, but only to those who employ people who work with children or disabled people.

The list helps with protection by ensuring the names of sex offenders are registered in order to prevent them from working with children and the disabled.

Nicolette Myburgh, the director of social services at Tutela, a community-based non-profit organisation with a group of autonomous organisations, including Save the Children, said that the information could prove vital for many South Africans, especially since cases of sexual offences were so high.

Read more

 

Join the discussion

  1. R M

    Not that I’d ever want to go there but I sent this message to Child rights Organisation Save the Children via email:

    Hello.

    I saw this article and wanted you to know that in the US, 95+% of new sex crimes are NOT committed by someone on a registry. I can provide you with multiple reports to back this up, if you are willing to listen. This statement, “Children in South Africa are at risk and if a person doesn’t disclose (their status), you will never know if they are a sex offender,” Myburgh said., is absolutely false. Surely the kids are at risk but like I said, 95+% of new sex crimes are NOT committed by someone on a registry.

    Also in the article it was said that “She said that generally there was a good reception to the petition, with many people throwing their weight behind it.” The only people who throw their weight behind it are emotionally and fear driven, registries do NOT prevent any crime.

    Regards,
    [me]

    • Janice Bellucci

      Thank you, RM, for sending that important message. We truly hope that the organization accepts your offer to provide them with the true facts about the registry and its significant impact upon individuals and families which fails to protect anyone. The registry provides a false sense of security. People who rely upon the registry are, in fact, looking in the wrong direction for those would could harm their loved ones. Instead of a list of registrants, they should look at family members, teachers, coaches and clergy who commit about 95 percent of sexual offenses according to the experts.

      • Tim Moore

        We also have to watch out for strangers, but the registry is really no help there either. Paying attention, and trying not to profile people, that is probably the best strategy. We all profile people, using selective and limited information. FWIW, I think it is learned, not innate. Kids learn this, watching their parents profile others. No wonder they trust the reverend and not the homeless man with a sign.

        • R M

          “Strangers” account for less than 5% of sex crimes. That does not justify all these crazy laws restricting us. If we, anyone, want to stop ALL crime we (they, whoever) are delusional and the Earth should just be wiped clean of humans.

  2. Facts should matter

    Predictably terrible idea. The Americianization of unwarranted fear has gone global.

    Children in South Africa are more at risk of famine, diseases and murder.

    • TS

      @Facts

      Don’t forget children there in SA are also in more risk of running out of water (seriously, they are) as well as been run out of the country or their entire family killed if they are white. SA is undergoing some huge changes internally, demographically, etc which is beyond the scope of this thread.

  3. Dustin

    I also wrote the organization, as follows:

    To Whom it May Concern:

    I recently read an IOL article where your organization has started a petition to make the NSRO publicly accessible. I recommend you do a little research before taking that position, based on the results of 20+ years of such policy in the United States.

    The fact is that well over 90% of new sex crime is not committed by those currently on the registry. The fact is that sex offender registrants are among the lowest recidivists of any crime in general (sex crime in particular), second only to murderers. The fact is that the registry has never prevented one single sex crime from commission. The fact is that the registry has never played a role in the investigation of a sex crime. The fact is that the costs of creating and maintaining the proposed registry are astronomical and there is no upgrade or improvement that could be made (also with astronomical costs) that will make it beneficial.

    While the article mentioned how the public could obtain registry information, it says nothing about what the public is supposed to do with the information or how it (supposedly) makes them safer. Despite 20+ years of a public registry in the United States, not one legislator or law enforcement official has ever made clear what steps someone is supposed to take to protect themselves from registrants (assuming such protection is necessary, which recidivism research has indicated is not). Not one single law enforcement official can show a case that would have been unsolvable but for the registry.

    Further, what about the children of registrants? They’re affected by the hardships and discrimination imposed on their registrant parents as well. Are they not worthy of your advocacy? Is it your organization’s position that children of registrants are better off in the government foster care system? While that may be true in a few isolated cases (such as where the children are the victims of the registrant’s offense), it is certainly not true in all cases across the board.

    Unfortunately, sex crime is and always will be a problem in any society, and will probably never be totally eliminated. But as demonstrated in the United States, a public registry does nothing to reduce it. Take a little time to research the effects of the American registry and you will find that is nothing more than a failed social experiment. Duplicating it would certainly lead to the same failed result.

    Frankly, I don’t anticipate a response. Will post it here if I do.

    • R M

      Thank you Dustin. I too will post any response I get; I’m doubtful I’ll get any also.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

.