ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Jan 16 Recording Uplaoded Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings

California

CA: Has criminal justice reform gone too far? One California lawmaker thinks so

[abc10.com – 2/21/19]

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Overcrowded prisons. Trying teens as juveniles versus adults. The power of rehabilitation and a belief in second chances. These issues have fueled criminal justice reform in recent years in the state of California. But some say the overhaul has gone too far.

People can generally agree, we all want to live in safe communities, but as Assemblymember Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove) told ABC10, the devil is in the details.

Exactly how to keep communities safe differs depending on who you ask.

Enter Proposition 57, also known as the Public Safety Rehabilitation Act of 2016 and the Parole for Non-Violent Criminals and Juvenile Court Trial Requirements Initiative. It’s something two-thirds of California voters approved back on the 2016 ballot.

On the surface, there’s a lot for some people to like. It allows judges—instead of prosecutors—to decide whether to try a teen in adult or juvenile court. A controversial law passed last year (SB 1391) added to that, making it harder for 14- and 15-year-olds to be tried as adults.

Prop 57 also gives some felons convicted of non-violent crimes a chance at early parole. Supporters say it emphasizes second chances, rehabilitation and easing overcrowded prisons. However, what does and does not qualify as a “violent felony” may surprise voters.

Rape of an unconscious person is not a “violent felony” under California law. Neither is assault with caustic chemicals — like throwing acid at someone’s face. Nor is human trafficking of a child — and more than a dozen other specific crimes.

“I think when you ask the majority of your viewers, they’re going to say, ‘Yeah, that person should be treated as a violent offender,'” Cooper said.

He’s a supporter of an initiative that has qualified for the 2020 ballot, the “Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act of 2020.” It promises, among other things, to “reclassify currently ‘non-violent’ crimes…as ‘violent’ — to prevent the early release of inmates convicted of these crimes.”

“We need to protect the public,” Cooper, who spent the better part of three decades serving in law enforcement, said. “There’s been a lot of legislation over the past three or four years — and some needed reforms, I’ll agree with you, but we’ve gone way overboard. And at what point—you don’t hear folks talking about victims in here. What are we doing to protect victims?”

Former Gov. Jerry Brown is against the initiative, tweeting in July, after it qualified for the 2020 ballot, “Read the fine print. This flawed initiative would cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars and endanger public safety by restricting parole and undermining inmate rehabilitation.”

Current California law has a long list of offenses that qualify as violent felonies. Murder and voluntary manslaughter are, of course, on the list. So are robbery and kidnapping. But one doesn’t have to look very far on the list to see where opponents take issue. Rape is third on the list of violent felonies – but not all circumstances of rape.

Rape is considered a violent felony when it is committed by anyone – including a spouse – “where it is accomplished against a person’s will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another” or “where the act is accomplished against the victim’s will by threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any other person.”

So what circumstances surrounding rape are not considered violent felonies? Any why aren’t all circumstances of rape considered violent?

Read more

 

 

Join the discussion

  1. TS

    “The 2020 initiative seeks to ‘expand DNA collection to include those convicted of drug, theft, domestic violence, and other serious crimes to help solve rape, murder, and other violent crimes — and to exonerate those wrongly accused.'”

    So, DNA will only help solve other violent crimes but nothing else? It will also help exonerate those wrongly accused? In what order will the processing of the DNA samples go, e.g. exoneration efforts first or second when compared to the solving of other crimes with new DNA gathered? Waiting for the state to do the right thing is like waiting for the Raiders or Chargers to finally decide where they want to play football before deciding they want to move again. Those who are working to be exonerated will take their DNA to outside the state lab system for analysis and work it through the court system on their own.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.