NC Bill: Convicted Animal Abusers Will Be Added to an Online Registry; Much Like Sex Offenders

[ – 4/2/19]

After a person’s first Animal Abuse offense, they would be put on the registry for the next two years. If they have another offense they would be put on the registry for five years.

If you are convicted of an animal abuse crime this bill reiterates you may be forced to give up any animals you own.

If you are a repeat offender and are put on the registry multiple times the proposed bill says you would have to give up your animals, and would not be able to own animals for the next five years.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As I’ve stated here many times the electronic blacklists will continue to expand into other spheres. The lists will lead to unnecessary abridging liberty based upon perception of necessity rather than actual need. Social movement will be hindered. The lists are about political control not safety. Safety is the excuse.

What exactly is the reasoning for creating a registry like this? What purpose does it serve? I’m not pro-animal abuse, but is community safety really diminished unless they know Billy Bob four houses down kicked his dog? Seriously?

Can we start a registry for legislators and politicians who write or support idiotic laws that ultimately serve no purpose?

The fallacy of a registry for animal abusers is that obviously the officials don’t understand the mind set of some of those they are targeting. Dog fighters are surely one of the most deranged people. Those people that host dog fights, train dogs to fight and make a profit from it surely have deep seated mental and emotional issues. And what the legislators fail to understand is that these people are so twisted they actually gain street creed by having a few convictions. Animal abuse sentences, even for something as violent and heinous as dog fighting are so slight that getting caught is of little consequence and the registry could actually help promote these individuals. They all have criminal records so they could care less, and in that culture criminal records are not of any consequence, and as I said can actually be favorable.

I guess the legislatures are thinking along the lines of the typical animal abuser who beats their pet and a registry will prevent them from buying a pet at a pet store or private seller. But is a pet seller actually going to check the registry for every buyer? We can’t even agree on firearm background checks. No, I believe the premise of this registry is the same as ours, to publicly shame and humiliate people, and somehow that is supposed to do something. It sounds good around election time.

If I rape an elephant will I be on both registries?

NC BILL: CONVICTED ANIMAL ABUSERS WILL BE ADDED TO AN ONLINE REGISTRY; MUCH LIKE SEX OFFENDERS – paroled child abusers and murderers breathe sigh of relief.