ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 16 – Sacramento, Dec 14 – Phone | details (2020 Dates added)

Emotional Support Group Meetings (Los Angeles, Sacramento, Phone)

National

MA: Baker to refile bill on sexual predators

[eagletribune.com – 5/20/19]

Gov. Charlie Baker will ask lawmakers once again to limit the release of sexual predators from prison.

The move follows last week’s ruling by the state’s highest court clearing the way for the eventual release of Wayne Chapman.

Convicted of raping two Lawrence boys in 1975, Chapman is also a suspect in the 1976 disappearance of Angelo Puglisi Jr., 10, of Lawrence. He has admitted to raping as many as 100 boys in eight states and Canada.

Chapman, 71, has been in prison for more than 40 years, most recently under the state’s civil commitment law, but the state Supreme Judicial Court ruled last week that he should be released immediately because two psychologists found he is no longer a threat to public safety.

In its decision, the court rejected arguments from the Baker administration and a lawyer representing several of Chapman’s victims that the system of evaluating sexual predators who are locked up indefinitely under the state’s civil commitment law is itself a threat to public safety.

Read more

 

Join the discussion

  1. Dustin

    The man’s hearing was about whether or not he was likely to commit another offense after release, which 2 STATE APPOINTED psychiatrists found was unlikely.

    Notice those opposed to his release can only refer to his original crimes of conviction 40+ years ago. To press full charges for masturbation in prison – which is ALWAYS dealt with through the prison’s discipline system – should open the DA down there up to a malicious prosecution claim. I’ll bet my left arm that this is the first time that charge was fully prosecuted in that office (if not nationwide) and in all likelihood was only be done because of the man’s pending release.

  2. mike r

    So,
    “More than 100 sex offenders have since been released under the Johnstone ruling, according to a review of state data. In most if not all cases, the Department of Correction and a five-member Community Access Board that reviews cases of sex offenders who are civilly committed disagreed with the conclusions of one or more examiners, according to state reports. But because of the Supreme Judicial Court ruling, the state has been powerless to stop their release.

    In Chapman’s case, he is still being held in MCI-Shirley, awaiting trial on new charges that he masturbated in front of prison staff. His trial is scheduled for June.

    Murphy said the fact that Chapman reoffended even after two medical examiners cleared him for release shows the review process is “dangerously flawed.”

    “He couldn’t even wait to get out prison before reoffending,” she said. “If that isn’t proof that the system is broken, I don’t know what is.”

    First off, how many of the 100 released have reoffended? Second, how convenient that he all of a sudden is being prosecuted for this so called masturbation charge after all these years and just before release. How convenient that they do not cite any of the 100 offenders that were released as repeated offenders. This entire case is suspect in so many ways…

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

.