MO: Sees statewide drop of unaccounted for sex offenders, 21 percent improvement reported

Fewer sex offenders are missing or unaccounted for in Missouri than in years past.

Last year, State Auditor Nicole Galloway’s office found that 1,300 sex offenders weren’t properly registering on the state’s sex offender website.

Tuesday Galloway said News 4 that law enforcement has reduced that number by 21 percent due to hard work and better accuracy.

“The sex offender registry is a public safety tool. People expect it to be accurate,” she said. “If information is held by highway patrol or local law enforcement, it’s imperative that it’s accurate, because that’s what the public expects.” Full Article

Related

http://www.newstribune.com/news/opinion/story/2019/jul/25/our-opinion-state-makes-strides-in-sex-offender-compliance/787910/

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I have no other alternative but to call bullshit on this article and Report. Either the first audit was completely off or they’re just plain lying. That is a fact!

A “public tool” that we’re not allowed to use….what a joke. And perfect example of how once you’re on “the list” you’re no longer a part of the Public nor afforded the same protections.

If it were abolished, the problem would be completely solved. Barring that, it seems maybe MO hasn’t been properly using the bribe money from Uncle Sam. What, no compliance checks?

I agree the numbers are probably BS. With STL probably accounting for the largest RC population in MO, its 6% reduction seems out of line with the State’s 21% reduction.

Post your comments here like I did: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKlelM76XQA

Nicole Galloway’s first audit which “discovered” all of the unaccounted registrants hit all the newspapers and local tv stations on October 2, 3018. She was in a tight race for auditor and the election took place on November 6th. It was all a media ploy. I know–shocking that someone in a tight election would use that card to get ahead.

“It’s imperative that it’s accurate, because that’s what the public expects.”

Just because something is “accurate” doesn’t mean that it’s relevant, useful or CREDIBLE!

To hell with what the public “expects.” Life is riddled with uncertainty and risk.. better get use to it.

Well…thank goodness all those people are listed correctly now. Now we should see a huge reduction in the number of news articles of sex crimes committed by registerred citizens in this area. Oh, wait.. There were no news articles because recidivism is really below 1 percent.