ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (01/15 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Recording of Emergency ACSOL meeting about new SORNA regulations



GA: New Legislation Would Allow Lifelong GPS Monitoring of Sex Offenders

When the Georgia Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a law allowing convicted sex offenders to be ordered to wear GPS ankle monitors for the rest of their lives after release from prison, several justices offered a concurring opinion saying the Legislature could write a law requiring such monitoring that would pass constitutional muster. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And the madness continues —

Ok, so who’s turn is it for reelection this time then?

Finding ways to circumvent the Constitution. Why don’t we just throw it out the window then and be done with it. Will save a lot of these idiots time.

I was on GPS monitoring when I was on bail. The stupid thing did not work half the time. I had the one that you had to lug around this huge transmitter. Must of weighed 10 pounds. The Pre-Trial Director initiated a court hearing for me (not my attorney) to go before the judge and speak on my behalf that this unit hindered my life so I could not even get a job. Judge agreed and put me on the lesser GPS unit. This one did not work any better but at least I barely knew I was wearing it. Odd part was that the Pre-Trial Director looked out for me much more than my own attorney. Yes, he was a public defender. How sad is that?!

The good news is that the very policies forced on SO’s will prevent this from ever happening. It was tried in California around 2006. Some low IQ, uninspired politicians thought it would give them some recognition. GPS monitoring costs several hundred dollars a month per person times around 100,000 people. But since the majority of people entering the registry will be unable to fine employment due to Meghan’s law and the many inhibiting rules then the state will have to foot the bill. As well, it would require massive staffing to monitor that many people round the clock, and since many thousands of registrants can’t find housing due to the oppressive restrictions, and they won’t be able to keep the GPS charged by no fault of their own then it would create a logistical nightmare.

Eventually a rough estimate of around $100 million a year of tax payer money was disclosed to the public to fund this idioicy and then the petition was quickly removed form the ballot and faded into anonymity. That was about 15 years ago. The registry continues to explode exponentially. A female friend said she recently looked online to see where all the SO’s lived. She said the map was nothing but red dots everywhere. Law enforcement has no way of knowing who actually lives anywhere anymore. And they even admit that the registry is so bloated that they can’t keep track of the few that are a real threat. More laws, more restrictions, more cost, more punishment, and yet statistic show that although people on the registry rarely reoffend, the rate of new offenses hasn’t decreased at all. Let those that have paid their debt to society rejoin the community so law enforcement can focus on real criminals.

Yes, ladies and gents, attorneys look at this and start to salivate on the potential case which is forming in the hands of the legislators currently…..

And so starts the possible march (if passed and signed into law) to SCOTUS and a ruling on the entire topic, i.e. agree to hear it or not and if they do, will it be allowed or not?, if challenged.

IMO, if you cannot attach a GPS to a car, US v Jones (2012), SCOTUS, without a warrant since it is considered a search, the human is in the same vein for movement tracking via a search without a warrant. Same is said for cellphone signals, Carpenter v US (2018), SCOTUS, and tracking of movement. There was a time when humans would walk everywhere, so my analogy is all movement regardless of method, e.g. car, horse, bicycle, scooter, boat, skateboard, roller skates, etc, cannot be electronically tracked by any method without a warrant.

Again, this comes down to using the data for what purpose and why does a human differ than a machine, i.e. a GPS tracker on a car or a cellphone with GPS on?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x