CA: Federal Judge Denies TRO Request to Stop In-Person Registration

A federal district court judge denied today a request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that would have immediately stopped in-person registration in Fresno County. The judge accepted statements from the county that the current registration process is “no contact,” socially-distanced, and takes places outdoors.

The judge did not allow registrants an opportunity to dispute those statements in a reply brief. Nor did the judge make reference to the Executive Order issued by Governor Gavin Newson on May 8, 2020, encouraging remote registration.

“The court’s decision to deny our TRO request means that hundreds of individuals who have high risk factors such as age (65 and older), diabetes, chronic asthma and/or a suppressed immune system must register in person facing possible infection by COVID19 during the registration process,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “And if the registrants are infected, they could infect others including their family members, law enforcement and the public.”

A lawsuit was filed challenging the in-person registration requirements of both the County of Fresno and the City of Fresno on April 28, 2020,in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District. Despite today’s ruling on the TRO, the lawsuit disputing in-person registration will continue.

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Funny stuff. Good to see everyone keep pretending that the emperor has clothes. This critical “public safety” harassment will continue. Personally, I always make sure it is counterproductive, pandemic or not. Just because. That is the moral thing to do to these harassing terrorists. Wage war.

I wonder that in this country of lawyers suing for anything and everything if this isn’t a legitimate opening to attack the system top to bottom. I would think a few covid deaths of registrants would suffice to have a legitimate if nothing other than a public nuisance suit against any entity involved in the registry. It could bring to light data showing the costs of the registration scheme. It’s ineffectiveness and counter productivity. The existence of kids on the registry etc.
This along with the Omaha murder of a registrant scream of a public lawsuit. America is sue-happy. America loves public, entertaining drama. It loves and is fascinated with sex. To bad Mattieo Condoluci wasn’t a perfect Romeo victim. (his murderer certainly makes for a solid freak-show killer).
Maybe there are perfect covid victim or victims out there somewhere.

Thoughts. I live in OC. I moved to LB for over 1 year 2-3 years back. I moved back to OC. OC courts are trash! I just registered my primary in LA County as a primary and secondary in OC. Read PC 290.010. I go back and forth, but consider LA my primary. I have a court date in LA in Sept for my COR. Thoughts? Ideas?

Couldn’t “no contact” also be done remotely? That’s even far better than “no contact” in-person re-reporting.