ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOLCalifornia

ACSOL Submits Formal Comments Regarding Proposed Tiered Registry Petition Forms [Updated 6/18 with Ellman comments]

[Updated 6/18 with Ira and Tara Ellman comments]

The Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) has submitted formal comments regarding proposed Tiered Registry petition forms to the Judicial Council of California. The deadline for submitting formal comments regarding the proposed forms is June 9, 2020.

“The comments submitted by ACSOL are based, in large part, upon input received from ACSOL members,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.

ACSOL provided a total of eight comments in an eight-page letter to the Judicial Council. The letter includes as an enclosure a document issued by the California Department of Justice which supports some, but not all, of ACSOL’s comments.

“The most significant comment made by ACSOL is the apparent lack of consideration for individuals who were convicted in federal, military and other non-California courts,” stated ACSOL President Chance Oberstein. “The Tiered Registry Law states those individuals are eligible to petition and therefore the proposed forms need to be modified accordingly.”

ACSOL’s comments also include a request to clarify that evidence of rehabilitation is not required when an individual submits his petition. Instead, that evidence can and should be provided only if the district attorney objects to the petition and a court hearing is scheduled.

Further, ACSOL’s comments include a request to specify what documents an individual can or should submit with his petition in order to prove he is currently registered. For example, individuals could provide a copy of their annual registration form and/or any other form, cards or confirmatory documents created and provided by registering agencies.

“ACSOL appreciates the opportunity to provide formal comments regarding the proposed Tiered Registry petitions,” stated Bellucci. “Petitions can be filed starting July 1, 2021.”

According to the California Department of Justice, registrants can obtain a copy of their Tier Assignment Letter on January 1, 2021, and later. The letters are important because they will notify registrants when they may be eligible to petition for removal from the registry.

Petition Forms – ACSOL Formal Comments – June 2020

Detailed comments that you can download below were also submitted by law professor Ira Ellman, a member of the ACSOL board, providing the statutory analysis showing why the current law does not exclude removal petitions from individuals on the registry for a federal, tribal, or non-California state offense. His comments, submitted jointly with his wife and coauthor, also provided guidance for how the forms could be revised to make them more clear to petitioners

Comments by Ira and Tara Ellman, as submitted (download PDF)

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What about actually assigning people based on individual assessment by experts rather than arbitrary assignment via penal code? Or is this a different sort of thing? (I’m not sure what kind of comments ACSOL is looking for here). Given the current giant spread of the actual type of crimes committed that are all being assigned to Tier 3, there seems to be little difference between everyone now being shoehorned in lifetime as a whole.

@SR

An assessment by a forensic psychiatrist who is not on the state’s preferred list would be best for those seeking an assessment. Foxes guarding hen houses isn’t needed.

I don’t know. CASOMB, the official state board, seems to be pretty clear on their below 1% recidivism report. The state seems to ignore everyone, regardless if the person/organization is on their preferred list or not. Does the state even have a single person with expertise that agrees with them registering anyone? Even the Static-99 Dr. Hansen does not seem to be advocating what the state is doing. Hell, the state even chooses to ignore half the Static-99 rules and guidelines that state the person’s recidivism fairly quickly goes down to nothing. At this point, it seems pretty clear the… Read more »

@SR

Wouldn’t be hard to find one who does it with a little online research and will provide a report with all the details one needs.

Still no word on 1204.3.

I know these things take time, but there needs to be something to address the discrepancy between a dismissed record and registering for life.

Wondering if there is a master list someone has put together that segments penal codes into Tier 1, 2, and 3. Some of us might be guessing exactly which Tier we’re going to be assigned to. Also, this might be helpful for those who get mis-assigned, which I can practically guarantee will happen. Some codes that existed 30 or 40 years ago may not even exist today. This could get complicated. I, for one, would love to have a resource such as this so I can have at least something to point to if I am assigned to the wrong… Read more »

Looking at the Q and A:

When and where do I petition for termination of my sex offender registration requirement in California?

On or after July 1, 2021, registrants who meet the mandated minimum requirements may petition the superior court or juvenile court in the county in which they reside.

For those of us who no longer reside in California, are we SOL? Or, does this mean we petition our county court in the state where we live? Will we need to move back to Calif to petition for relief??

@Hoping for hope. The am not a lawyer so take my read as just one opinion. If you are currently out of state I do not think SB 384 will apply to you – you are not a resident of California and therefore not required to register in California. I would expect there will be challenges to no path for people who have moved out of state. There are several law firms which have published a breakdown of offense codes and tier placement, the information is also in the law itself if you want to try and track which sub… Read more »

CA is currently one of few states such as FL and NY who never remove people from the registry whether or not you live here. You don’t have to register annually with the state, but you’re still on the books as being on the registry for the purposes of anything that checks that such traveling. And I believe unlike the COR which required you to have continues residency in the state to qualify for it, the tiered registry doesn’t. It just looks at how much time has passed since your conviction to qualify you.

California removes individuals from its registry after they leave the state on a permanent basis provided that the individual reports his/her departure to local law enforcement. In that way, California is not similar to Florida and New York.

Thank you for the correction, Janice.

@Interested Party. I hear ya, but the ONLY reason I am required to register in my home state right now is because California says I have to, under the “long arm of the law”. My home state does not have lifetime registration, only 20 years. They can’t have it both ways. California cannot require me to register for life in other states that don’t have lifetime registration while at the SAME TIME denying my ability to petition for relief. Seems to me you cannot fall under one law, ie, the law that requires registration, but then NOT fall under another… Read more »

“But as I read it it is like application for a CoR you have to be living in California and meet a minimum time frame in the state prior to application.”
—–
It’s (still) my belief this is unconstitutional. See: Saenz v. Roe (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/489/).

It’s my understanding that if you’re living out of state you are under the laws of that state. With most states being SORNA compliant, in those states the register ‘for life’ requirements have been removed for tiers 1 and 2, and you will have to register for the maximum time frame for your tier. For instance, Tier 1 max is 15 years

I didn’t see this issue brought up: Rule 4.530. Intercounty transfer of probation and mandatory supervision cases. Of note is this part: “Upon transfer of the case, the receiving court must accept the entire jurisdiction over the case.” I was convicted in Orange County and served 3 months in county jail. Just prior to my sentence, I made arrangements to move to San Francisco because I learned of this pending rule before it was enacted. The county is mandated to transfer probation to where the probationer lives. The rule above went into effect 3 days before my release. Orange County… Read more »

Thank you, Janice and team! *** ACSOL’s comments also include a request to clarify that evidence of rehabilitation is not required when an individual submits his petition. Instead, that evidence can and should be provided only if the district attorney objects to the petition and a court hearing is scheduled. *** But how do you prove you’re not doing anything wrong when you haven’t done anything wrong for the period of time that you qualify for? How does one have prove their innocence? I thought you’re innocent until proven guilty? If you’re clean for a decade for tier 1 or… Read more »

thank you so much for listing these options.
i think if something that looks like is “Missing,” it is because it is not the time or place for it.
We all know their stance on issues they want to change. If they felt like this where they should put it, then they would of.

Is there a way to read all the comments from everyone online at their site? I couldn’t find anything pro or con.

There are several dynamics going on right now. First, we have a tiered registration system and frankly, I’m skeptical. I have seen so little willingness to give an inch regarding prosecution, probation, parole, prison, etc. I just won’t believe they will let us out of their clutches without a fight. To those who find relief, I am genuinely glad for you. Secondly, we are in the middle of a pandemic and the state is going to face reduced revenues and added expenses. The budget is going to be a mess for several years–at least. Third, there is a giant wave… Read more »

An oddball thought, perhaps all sex offenders should consider a campaign to adding a new category to sexual orientation we would fit in and then using this to be considered a protected class.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018

Once again, those of us who were sacrificial lambs with the last minute move from Tier 1 to Tier 3 are again ignored. There is absolutely no legitimate reason that I should be Tier 3 when five manipulated felonies that only resulted in 14 months in custody (12 of them in county jail) and 3 years of parole. But yet, we continue to be ignored by the efforts to change the tiering.

I’m currently looking at Tier 3 as well. I plead to a felony and a misdemeanor for taking an upskirt photo of a minor. I did 60 days in county via weekends (would’ve been easier to do it all at once, but it allowed me to keep my job and all that comes with that). Did 3 years of mandatory group therapy, 2 years of mandatory individual therapy, plus I did an extra year of voluntary group because it was helpful for my life overall. Three other guys in our group who are also looking at Tier 3 were their… Read more »

@td777 I am sorry to see the obvious pain you feel. ACSOL continues to fight to for everyone on the registry. This process you are commenting on was one for a very limited scope. It was requesting comments on the form for people requesting to be relieved of having to register. This was not an opportunity to reform the tiers or registration. Unfortunately, until the tiered registration goes into affect it seems the vast majority of our representatives are content to wait and see. If/when ACSOL does the next lobbying day will be the next/best opportunity to push for the… Read more »

@Td while I will admit i’m not to familiar about teir ordeals that much but is it an off shoot from military ranking of a human being. Seems to me this tier thing is a bit overshadowing. Say you stold a car and modified it a bit would their be different teir levels for that person, or is it like branding cattle or how many suggestive pictures one has or hasn’t or how many off colored jokes one can mustard. One might say Groucho would fit the bill or maybe Mr. T. or either an obscene phone caller. Much of… Read more »

@Td777,
And you can thank Lorena Gonzales for your sacrifice. That bitch and only that bitch put CP offenses at tier 3. ACSOl has had several capital runs to fight for change. It’s not over. But until we all fight these vendetta type politicians, I am afraid more tier changes are in store.

It’s an easy shoo-in for reoffense. They hope to catch people in online stings and get them for as long as they can. Ultimately they’ll system manipulate people back up to a higher tier. Tier 1 people will have to walk on eggshells, hopefully they know the basics on how to survive but sadly the system already has the board covered with their dirty tricks. At Mike below The time is a way the law makers figured so that the system survives. Politics, elections, judicial terms, scandals, protests, etc. They hope to tie people up in a waiting game so… Read more »

Hello, what I’ve always want to know is why on the tier registry why do they have tier 1= 10yrs , tier 2= 20yrs, tier 3= lifetime. Whats the reason for the length of time you must register on each tier. To me it seem like length time is way overboard. Compare the length of probation of 1,2,3,5 years, when compared to registration which is 3 to 4 times longer than probation. Why does tier 1 have to register for 10 before they can petition, if your granted. Why does tier 2 have to register for 20 years. What is… Read more »

It’s not supposed to make sense. All of it is based on idiocy. It’s known that the Registry Hit List isn’t needed or beneficial. All of this is just for theater, to get some people their jollies, and to get some people paid.

In California 6/12/2020 With all of the recent uproar over Covid and Now the BLM riots the level of anger towards LE is higher than ever culminating with calls to defund the police . As this continues to be pushed At the very least all departments will be looking at what things that do not contribute to public safety and eliminate them . Wouldn’t it be great if the registry itself was on the chopping block . We are looking at a situation where there will have to be cutbacks due to budget shortfalls on top of the number of… Read more »

The interesting view’s on here are good in many ways. From Cash 22’s view to Will Allen’s soap spoon evaluation to those that use this teir factor as a determining factor of this registry tier level ordeal and even this life time of confusion. One might wonder what level the lady caught in adultry would be in or even the level of say a murder ordeal nor even a bank rober in many cases. Today is a day to remember as one article is mentioned on here. Well everyday should be a day to remember and yes even governments can… Read more »

Hello Janice and Chance,
I was listening to the phone conference and tried to get through to ask a question but I couldn’t.
My question has to do with approved offender programs that will be accepted for the purpose of petitioning for relief from registration.
Is there a list? I went through a program from a L.A. County court and was wondering if it will be accepted.

31
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.