Jill Levenson Issues New Report Regarding Life on the List

[Danielle Arlanda Harris and Jill Levenson – International Journal of  Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology – 9/7/20]

In their recent report, “Life on ‘The List’ is a Life Lived in Fear:  Post-Conviction Traumatic Stress in Men Convicted of Sexual Offenses,” [a download link is at the bottom of this post] Dr. Danielle Arlanda Harris and Dr. Jill Levenson cogently demonstrate the inherent stress for Registrants as they pursue basic needs for survival as outlined in Maslow’s Hierarchy while simultaneously combating symptoms connected to PCTS (Post-Conviction Traumatic Stress). The report also offers strategies to cope with the inherent stress that arise from such encounters.

Maslow’s Hierarchy includes safety, social acceptance, self-efficacy, and self-actualization; these are essential as Registrants attempt to procure employment, housing, and social relationships. However, as Registrants work towards constructing a healthy life they must do so while on a list whose “stigma can create stress, anxiety, fear, shame depression, loneliness, social isolation and hopelessness.” For Registrants, the combination of incarceration followed existence on the list has created the major symptoms of PCTS: Intrusive thoughts, Avoidance, Negative thoughts or feelings and Hyperarousal.  The report conveys that it is ideal to confront these hurdles with a “resilient coping” strategy that is “pro-active in keeping [Registrants] safe” as opposed to employing a “traumatic coping” plan that is “accented by crippling and ultimately futile and hypervigilance” to secure safety. Nonetheless, it does recognize that adopting a resilient coping strategy will be more challenging for individuals who have experienced traumatic events during childhood.

Harris and Levenson accrued data from interviews with over seventy men. These men asserted on varying levels that they practiced “avoidance” not because they were concerned about reoffending, but because they were fearful of misinterpretation, and “that the life they are rebuilding could be taken away at any time.” The report notes, “Indeed, a focus on strengths and prosocial goals rather than on shaming and stigma is more consistent with empirically-supported strategies for minimizing dynamic risk and enhancing successful re-entry.”

In recognizing the report’s narrow database (only men from a few ethnicities were interviewed and all samples were taken from the North Eastern United States), the authors gain credibility: “We acknowledge the limits of the generalizability of our findings, but it does not diminish the profound challenges our interviewees reported while living on the list.”

Life on the List – PTSD – Jill Levenosn – Sep 2020 [PDF download]


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

To most here, this may be obvious based upon their life dealing with the topic; however, this is an excellent view into the topic amd men dealing with it. I recommend saving and sharing it with others so they too can understand. I see even a section the 10th CCOA could use to understand the registry as well as other courts.

I have been thinking about how the whole edifice of sex offender registration is built on a single powerful lie: “Sex offender registration is not punishment”. This lie allows the courts and legislature to basically do anything they want. Ex Post Facto punishment, arbitrary changes in rules, escalation of penalties, ect.

It sets up an angle of attack on these laws. Document the historical meaning of punishment, the nature of registration and how it affects it’s victims.

Last, we need to compare this to other “administrative laws” for the safety of the community. For instance, drug addicts kill significantly more children than sex offenders. In fact, when a sex offender kills a child, we almost always discover that he was a drug addict too. Yet, drug offenders are never forced to register.

It’s sad what the sex offender registry has done to people’s lives once your placed on the registry your literally locked in a virtual prision cell cut off from Society it sucks and sometimes almost impossible to deal with.
I know more then 50% the people forced to register are hardcore criminals and deserve a harsher punishment then outher offenders hopefully next year when SB384 goes into effect this will help separated people convicted of sex crimes from SVP’s and people convicted of sex crimes involving children.

Good luck