Dystopian AI Patent Uses Facial Recognition to Identify Homeless and Drug Users [and Sex Offenders]

[interestingengineering.com – 2/12/21]

Last year, The New York Times reported that, in order to test its software, facial recognition startup Clearview AI collected up to three billion images from platforms including YouTube and Facebook without attaining users’ express consent.

Now, a new patent application by Clearview AI, first discovered by Buzzfeed, details several potential uses for the firm’s software, including date matching, sharing “headshots of high-risk individuals,” and identifying homeless people and drug users.

The technology could also be used to identify a “sex offender”

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And this surprises…who?

On a side note, the ink for the “public safety” rubber stamp seems to account for the majority of the office supply budget in most legislatures…

@ q: It’s a shame no one thought to use that big rubber stamp of “Public Safety” on something potentially useful …. say, for example, “Pandemic Preparedness”. 🤔

Over at the Electronic Frontier Foundation @eff.org is a sub- group contemplating facial recognition and social impact. The fact that the 1994Omnibus bound inextricably the ” sex offender” and ” the people’s use of the machine database” cannot be placed upon the criminal.That was the choice of ” leadership. ” A truth is the very second slavery was imposed without process upon them, the rest soon followed. If you’re going to opt for 1 unconstitutional use in a republic then all unconstitutional uses are possible. This is why the insistence of sec.230 U.S.Code! & the similarly motivated declarations on the registry database referred to as disclaimers. Speech itself was the issue in Packingham as it relates to the database use. We live in a time when the value of the database machine outweighs the value the human.

Suggestion for Janice:

My understanding is that registry photos are intended to be viewable by humans. Why not introduce legislation, requiring the inclusion of enough “artifacts” into online registration photos, so that they are viewable by humans but are unusable by algorithms? This requirement would only apply to public facing systems, to prevent the unauthorized use of images.

I’ll keep repeating this:

Do you want less oppressive laws and politicians dictating your life?

Do you value Freedom at all?

Solutions:
1) Vote for Smaller Government

2) Use Cryptocurrencies

That’s it.

There are companies that are having success at making cloaking software to keep recognition software from working.

Image “Cloaking” for Personal Privacy
http://sandlab.cs.uchicago.edu/fawkes/#code