In Furor Over Poet With Child Porn Conviction, Prison Abolitionists Debate the Limits of Mercy

[theintercept.com – 2/14/21]

Is Poetry magazine “platforming toxicity” or promoting the “practice of freedom”?

A bedrock principle of the prison abolitionist movement is that you don’t ask an incarcerated person what they’re in for. It’s more than etiquette. To eschew the identity that the punitive state assigns — which could be false — is to see someone whole. “Each of us is more than the worst thing we’ve ever done,” says Equal Justice Initiative founder Bryan Stevenson. Even a murderer is somebody’s baby.

That’s the way guest editors Tara Betts, Joshua Bennett, and Sarah Ross — poets, abolitionists, and educators behind bars and in the free world — approached the submissions to “The Practice of Freedom,” the February 2021 issue of Poetry magazine. The issue features the work of people who are or were incarcerated, their families, and those who work in “carceral spaces.” The contributors had already been judged and punished; the editors would judge the work, no rap sheet attached, not its makers.

And this is how a poem by Kirk Nesset made it into the pages of Poetry. Nesset, a 63-year-old former Allegheny College English professor, pleaded guilty in 2015 to possession, receipt, and distribution of child pornography; he was sentenced to 76 months in federal prison and released this fall. He is now on the sex offender registry in Arizona.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This article makes me so upset. Why are all other crimes besides sex crimes okay? Why don’t the victims from the other poet writers demand the removal of their entries? I just don’t get what is going through these people’s minds.

This man has done his time. End of story. He should be just as equal as anyone that served time. I am happy to hear that the editors did not remove the poem in question. Good for them! Way to stand up!

Of course, I’m sorry for what victims have to go through. But this isn’t a debate about criminals vs. victims. It’s about a poem. It’s about literacy. Who gives a shit what the writer has done. Let him/her speak through poetry and get off your high-horse.

It’s not like the poem is inciting criminal behavior. I think it’s absurd in silencing the Registrant’s voice in the arts and literature from society. If anything we need to be heard more.

I think as a whole society have put too much emphasis on covering up uncomfortable truths: that we are more than the sums of our past charges. The refusal for this “victim society” to humanize the Registrant only keeps the healing process from occurring between the victim and the perpetrator.

And what about those with CP charges that have no victims? I’m one of those Registrants. Should I never be heard so we can mollycoddle these “perpetual victims” so they can never heal and be the continual mascot for militant activists? I know that’s a harsh thing to say…but there’s truth in harsh things.

I’ll say again – there was not ONE SINGLE COMPLAINT about the poem, only the author. The same people would tell AIDS patients not to take the cure if the person who discovered it was a registrant.

I believe part of the problem is sex something all humans engage in at some point; which way to many people are outraged while they have sexual fantasies or sex skeletons in their closet. Don’t look at my sex life, it’s those people. Nobody mentioned his poem just his crime causing outrage. If people are outraged by someone then don’t engage with that person; but don’t project your outrage on others to influence them.

In America, there’s NO escaping the weaponized hatred that the label “sex offender” fosters. Because of the emotional hysteria and toxic climate the label promotes, you’re simply unable to live your life to the fullest all because of fabricated controversy and manufactured outrage. Once on the registry, there’s no lower bar to set. Talented and want to contribute and give back? Sorry, you’ll always be a gutter ball no matter how hard you aim for a strike.

Banishment. Disenfranchisement Disinclusion Censorship.

All in the name of “public safety.”

Poor guy had 76 months of HIS LIFE removed for digital images of what has already occurred in the past.

Now THAT is the true tragedy!