IN: Bill would allow adults to be charged for sex crimes they committed years earlier as minors

[ – 3/16/21]

Indiana lawmakers are considering a bill that would allow courts to charge people over the age of 21 as adults for child molestation acts they committed when they were teenagers.

Supporters say they are trying to address an unintentional gap in Indiana law. They say there is no way to criminally convict those who are over 21 years old for child molestation acts they committed as teenagers.

“There’s a gap in the law where the perpetrator has no accountability,” said David Powell, a representative from the Prosecuting Attorneys Council, in a hearing about the bill March 9.

Opponents of the measure criticized the idea of charging someone as an adult for actions they committed when they were children, potentially a decade ago or longer.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I thought these laws were to protect teenagers and children. How many teens engage in risky behavior caused by raging hormones, peer pressure, immaturity, and other circumstances? Now the authorities want to press charges on someone who did something wrong as a teen. Will these laws include law makers and those holier than thou do gooders accountable for their sexual experience as teenagers? If not they need to stand down, back off and get off their judgmental pedestal!! Enough is enough with this bashing over sexual behavior in this freedom loving country. Freedom isn’t free but most Americans are dumber than a door knob.

So I wonder how many of them will voluntarily turn themselves in for having sex while in high school.

I hate that the Representative makes it so difficult to contact them to comment about their abuse of power. Most have you jumping through hoops to email them even if you are a constituent.
I guess I will just have to go the old fashion route and drive to her office to bitch slap her back into reality.

Oh well isn’t this now going to stir up a can of worms. Supposedly persons under 18 are not mature enough to consent to any type of sex. So by definition any type of sex between two persons under 18 is then considered non-consensual and can be charged for it. But who will be charged for it. The boy or the girl, the girl or the boy, either boy, either girl – what/who determines that?

What counts as child molestation when it involves two children? Who is the perpetrator and who is the victim? Oh the hell with it. Let’s just charge all persons that just turn 21 with some type of sexual crime they MUST HAVE committed when they were under 18 as most have had some sort of sexual connection/activity by that age with at least one person who was also under 18.

I could never understand this two way street. A person’s brain is not yet fully developed until around 25 but yet can be held responsible for things they MAY have done when they were 14?