IL: Illinois judge who reversed sex offender’s conviction is reassigned

Source: 1/15/22

The Illinois judge who sparked outrage after reversing a sex offender’s conviction has been reassigned.

According to the Herald-Whig newspaper, on Thursday Adams County Judge Robert Adrian was removed from presiding criminal cases and reassigned to civil cases — including small claims, legal matters and probate dockets.

Adrian first made headlines earlier this month, after he overturned the conviction of 18-year-old Drew Clinton, who had been found guilty in the sexual assault of a 16-year-old girl last year.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I have to admit I agree with the judge that the incident wouldn’t of happened if alcohol wasn’t provided and parents would of been responsible. Sorry she was assaulted but she wouldn’t of been unconscious if she wasn’t drinking.

So was the Judge’s “reassignment” civil regulatory or punishment for bad behavior?

He served five months. How much longer should he have got?

There is meaning in this article. While rape is bad enough who is the guilty party the one with the action/ or .. the innocent victim that was passed out and was raped. While the judge is guilty in this case of after the fact action the boy was bad enough.Yes the boy was judged and he was found guilty.
 The judge overturned the action or alternate judgement and placed the blame on the obvious which was on the parents. A bit vain and shallow in and of itself in this type of judgment call. In other words a real scenario vs a fictitious one. Sting operations are somewhat like this. 
While a judge can call the shots in this liberty were does the justice falter in much of this human error factor. Are many of these sting ordeals the hijack trappings one endures . Their is a constitutional issue at stake of responsibility.

Past, present, or future tense in this lesson of justice is a judgement call of an unoriginal circumstances. Good Article Janice to let others know that justice can be altered by even a blind man that judges. Justifying in real time situations can be so upsetting in many justice imbalances. Railroading justice is nothing to sneeze about.

Have to agree with the judge. And the so called Victim running to the restroom to cry well she’s a [Moderators edited profanity]
h hope she was crying about her immaturity and the poor choice she made to consume alcohol so young. Ya the 18year old shouldn’t have taken advantage. this was a crime of opportunity and I didn’t read anywhere that she was forced to consume alcohol. Lucky 18 year old got lucky this time hope he doesn’t make the same dumb decision.