LGBTQ People on Sex Offender Registries in the US (Paper)

Source: UCLA in 5/2022

The United States has the world’s largest prison population. Overall, mass incarceration disproportionately impacts people of color, people with disabilities, and the LGBTQ community. LGBTQ people are at increased risk for being targeted for sex crimes, as historical prejudice and stigma have depicted LGBTQ people—especially gay/bisexual men—as sexual predators. Despite this, little is known about LGBTQ people on sex offender registries in the United States.

In this project, we surveyed people who are required to register on sex offender registries (SOR).

Read and download the research paper


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ahhh… History of registries. Right after they failed to keep mobsters out, they were used for “perverts”… What we now call LGBTQ.

There is/was(?) for arsonists. We don’t hear much about that one, do we.

Originally, the availability of all of them was for law enforcement only… Which is what makes the SO registry such an onerous mess.

This is a good article. I always wondered why on the static-99 they give one an extra point if the victim was a boy vs a girl. That alone shows theyre using bias towards homosexual/bisexual individuals.

It is fairly obvious that homosexuality & deviant sexuality are considered synonymous by the people’s of the book. In Lawrence v Texas the Supreme Court recognized activity in a private residence between consenting adults was a liberty interest protected from police incursion. While many believe the case upheld gay sex as constitutional, that is not the reality. Most people believe slavery has been abolished too, and they are wrong. An inspection of the 13th Amendment describes both. When a Catholic nun points out this reality as did Sister Prejean, folks should listen, but they do not. Americans lose when they deny some “property owners” fought to the death to defend the practice! What makes people think “electronic property” would be any different in terms of social benefit by infrastructure? “New dress dear?” “Nah, Same old.”

I can do this all day. What part, of what political party, in the United States, hates LGBTQ folks the most?

Gay men have long been equated with perversion and pedophilia in the South. Unfortunately that myth is still alive, especially in the small counties of Florida.

personally, I think that our advocacy is pretty outright dismissive of the LGBT community.