NM: Two sex offender bills supported by Keller contained differences

Admin

SANTA FE – The 2011 sex offender legislation that’s surfaced as political ammunition against Tim Keller in Albuquerque’s mayoral race came about after repeated – and largely successful – lawsuits against New Mexico’s largest city for enacting local ordinances that went beyond what was then on the state’s books. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Let Heaven & Earth bear witness to the Intent & Actions of these Wicked Usurping Servants.

“Basically, we were trying to do anything we could to make [Former] sex offenders uncomfortable in Albuquerque,” Chávez said in a recent interview.

————~~~~<<<<<>>>>~~~~~~————-
In other words Executing: Extra Judicial Punishment:^ A clear violation to The U.S. & it’s States Constitutions. Inaddition to Spitting on the Face of International Human Rights.

“However, many of the provisions in Albuquerque’s [Former] sex offender ordinance were struck down by the courts as being unconstitutional after the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico filed suit. Only a few restrictions were left in place.”

“[The bill] also closed a [False] perceived loophole dealing with [Former] sex offenders who move to New Mexico from other states.

“Our families deserve to know that we are doing everything we can to protect them from [Former] sex offenders, provide law enforcement with the most complete information and make our communities as safe as possible,” Martinez said after signing the bill into law.”

^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_punishment

I speak a True song

As Yehovah lives, so should we

0
Reply

Wow, everything comes down on top of the heads of registrants! This is ridiculous! Can they discuss real issues? Issues that can make their city a better, kinder and more pleasant place for everyone?

0
Reply

strange article , but it shows how these people can change faces , uncomfortable ? lol ,well that’s a nice start , how bout unconstitutional

0
Reply

“He’s got a record of voting on something that’s absolutely dangerous and disgusting.”

It’s what could be said about everyone who votes for SOR laws.

….

0
Reply