GA: Can’t pay for a lie detector test? For one man that could mean jail

A North Georgia homeless man may go to prison for 18 months because he cannot come up with $250 to take a court-ordered polygraph test.

Such a move would seem to violate a U.S. Supreme Court ruling declaring it unconstitutional to jail someone for failing to pay a fee or fine. But the man’s attorney, McCracken Poston, said the state Department Community of Supervision is nonetheless pushing for the punishment.

“It’s crazy,” Poston told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, saying his client, Robert Murphy, has been unable to find a job since he was convicted of a sex offense and had recently been living under a bridge that spans the South Chickamauga Creek. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And yet, he doesn’t have to register as a sex offender. He’s actually in far better shape than the average registrant, though his plight is still horrible. I’m not trying to make light of his situation, but compare it to having to register.

Read the latest WAR blog, registrants chances for employment are sabotaged on a daily basis.
The governmental barriers for sex offenders who have served their time and are trying to find jobs are ridiculous.
And then, to add insult to injury, the government expects those who they have forced into joblessness to pay fees for registry, polygraphs, sex offender treatment, etc, with money they don’t have or be locked up, again.
This guy is sleeping out in the cold, eating food out of cans and the government still insists on reaching into his pockets to try and make a buck.
Our government is seriously twisted. It’s sick. It’s cruel and unusual punishment. The registry needs a complete overhaul. Maybe now that so many in Politicians and Hollywood stars of fame and fortune are being accused of sex abuse, maybe now the Registry, will get a second look.
We can’t very well have all those powerful and well off people being labeled registrants, now can we?
Oh, silly me, they’re called “sex addicts” and go to fancy resorts for “treatment” of their Non-DSM-V illness. Meanwhile, John Q. Public gets labeled “violent sex offender” gets thrown in jail or prison where they receive no treatment at all. Then when they get out they are forced to participate in treatment that they have to pay for. They get arrested for failure to pay fines, because they can’t find minimum wage jobs to pay for treatment, registry fees or polygraphs that aren’t even admissible in courts anymore.
It’s just sad.

Agreed Kat, this is getting close to Nazism and the Japanese internment camps, and is definitely worse then McCarthyism, oligarchy, feudalism, dictatorship, slavery and many other disgusting gov. entities and actions. It’s also tbe definition of demagoguery.

Will be approaching this problem myself. The PO-selected polygrapher here refuses to test me because I had the nerve to complain when I “passed” their first stupid test and they submitted someone else’s “failed” test to my PO. Admin error they say they fixed. I wanted proof in writing since I can’t view my probation file and they won’t provide it. Nor will they give me the test I paid for, eventually claiming (falsely) it falls under HIIPA. When I submitted formal complaints to the state probation department, the BBB, and every polygraph agency they are a member of (all ignored), they got the PO to lean on me to back off. Only did because I can’t afford a lawyer.

My next test, I told the tester that I wanted a note made that there was reason to believe the results were predetermined. After a little more confrontation, I “passed” his stupid test despite his best efforts (confining the space sat in, long pauses between questions, etc.). Afterward, the polygrapher said his company wouldn’t test me any more because I obviously don’t trust them. Go figure.

Now, my problem. I’m due again in January and all the cheapest I’ve found is around $500. No way I can come up with that – could barely raise the $225 the other clowns wanted. Tried to bring the matter to my PO at my last check-ins, but he wasn’t there and won’t answer my texts. Not sure how this is going to play out. Currently trying to put my case together for a revocation hearing, but not sure how to have it available to me if I end up back in county.