FL: Beach to consider sexual offender ordinance

With the more people coming to St. Augustine Beach, the police department thinks it’s time to consider a sexual offender ordinance. … “We’ve seen the crowds double in the past couple years, and the ordinance will protect both the residents and tourists,” Parker said. He also said the city needs to adopt a sexual offender ordinance because there have been two related incidents within their jurisdiction.

“Recently we had an incident on the beach with a guy who was using binoculars to watch girls,” he said. … “He turned out not to be a sexual offender, but that really drove home the need to have an ordinance,” Parker said. “We don’t want to delay it anymore.” …

Parker said there is only one other incident in recent years involving a sexual offender on the beach. There was an out-of-county man at the Splash Park a couple years ago who had failed to register as a sexual offender. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Florida ….. what more can be said?? *shakes head in disbelief & disgust*
The comments are interesting.

Writing a law for a problem that doesn’t exist?? Someone clearly has too much free time on his hands! (Note: The man in the beach watching girls with his binoculars was NOT an RSO and so his behavior would not be impacted one bit by this proposed law.)

‘Recently we had an incident on the beach with a guy who was using binoculars to watch girls,” he said. … “He turned out not to be a sexual offender, but that really drove home the need to have an ordinance,” Parker said. “We don’t want to delay it anymore.” …’

People like this Parker think if you are on this list, you are going to offend and if you are not on the list you aren’t. How stupid is this? Well, with 95% of the new sex offenses done by people NOT on the registry, the guy with the binoculars was decidedly more likely to be a sex offender than someone registered. I wouldn’t even get my trunks in a knot over that. The likeliest offenders are the parents and guardians on that beach. Let’s give them all a polygraph and genetic test before letting them on the beach. No, really, Florida might just do that.

If only this were possible…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiTM2HQ0g98

Dear Parker,

If you don’t want guys looking at the girls in swimsuits, why not an ordinance that bans swimsuits and/or immodest attire on the beach altogether? That will rid all the creeps with binoculars and sex offenders and solve your problem.

They should be less concerned about men with binoculars and more concerned about these filthy scoundrels at their precious Florida beaches. Better yet, ban Spring Break activities because this is not the first time nor will it be the last time this happens. FYI: Neither of the accused are registrants. And they’re young enough to have grown up under the “protect the children” umbrella, too. So what good would an ordinance do?

http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/2-students-charged-in-Florida-spring-break-sex-6195147.php

Florida is a good state to avoid, even for those whom are not RC.

“If a sexual offender or predator goes to a park with no legitimate reason to be there and are exhibiting suspicious behavior, they can be questioned by law enforcement,” ~

So, if some non RSO “goes to a park with no legitimate reason to be there and are exhibiting suspicious behavior”, they get a high five, box of chocolates & a season pass? Sounds legit.