Payment Providers And Google Will Kill The Mug-Shot Extortion Industry Faster Than Lawmakers Can

‘A picture lasts forever’ is likely not the thought going through a person’s head when he or she is being booked at the clink (well, unless that person is Lindsay Lohan). Yet mugshots have over the last few years taken on an Internet permanence thanks to a host of sites that use liberal public records laws to get their hands on mugshots and make them part of people’s Google footprints. The industry first started getting scrutiny two years ago when Wired highlighted a Florida mugshot site that made its money by publishing slammer shots and running ads alongside them, or worse, charging people to have them taken down. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  18. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  19. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  20. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Keep in mind it was the lawsuit initiated by Janice and CA RSOL that started the national debate on extortion sites in the first place. Even though much of the focus seems to be on non-RSO’s and their tribulations with these (in my opinion) felony-level criminals, it is the lawsuit that brought out the AP and Reuters’ stories. Without them, all other stories would have remained regional or local at best, and would not have attracted the attention to the search and payment enabler companies like Google and Paypal.

Congratulation…another victory, even before the arguments are given! But go after them anyway and make them pay if feasible.

For all of those convinced that corporations are the greatest threat to our civil liberties – and not government – this example brilliantly refutes.

Are corporations often a beneficiary of government tyranny? Absolutely! Are they RSO’s greatest threat? Absolutely not!

According to Google, they claim to have changed their algorithm to rank these sites lower, yet a a search for my name still brings up a mugshot from, a site whose very name is a farce and who is not included as one of the extortion sites even though it is, as the very first image. In other words, they have done almost nothing!

We can hope these sites do what they claim, but I’m not holding my breath.

yup. my mug is right there on the first google page. Homefacts appears to be immune thus far.

I highly recommend that individuals complain to Home Facts about their listings and educate that website regarding what Google and others are doing. They need to hear from individuals who are affected by these listings not just from attorneys who they believe are paid to speak out even when we are volunteers.

Once something is on the Internet, it’s practically on there for good. I’m still trying to get search providers to drop a fictitious business name I changed twelve years ago. I still get junk mail under that name. The courts seem to think registration is merely filling out some paperwork and see the Internet as some innocuous forum when it comes to being listed there. Ironically, the Internet is seen as supreme threat when your children are on it, or if some secret document the government doesn’t need you to see is posted. This is “unusual” to say the least, and cruel negligence to those people who lose jobs, are harassed and even killed because of a listing.

I hope they do kill the mug shot extortion industry.