On February 13 of this year, ____ ____ went to the Chicago Police Department Headquarters to register as a sex offender. He was one of 22 people who were turned away that day because the office was simply too busy. That’s according to police records. A month later, on March 21, ____ ____ was approached by Chicago police officers on the West Side of Chicago. Full Article
Related posts
-
IL: How do scores of Chicagoans arrested for sex crimes stay off the sex offender registry once convicted?
Source: nbcchicago.com 10/22/24 When John heard the news on a recent Friday, it hit him hard:... -
IL: New Illinois law clarifies rules on AI-generated child pornography
Source: myjournalcourier.com 8/13/24 Gov. J.B. Pritzker has signed into law legislation clarifying that Illinois’ existing child... -
Judge Tosses Biometric Data Suit Against X
Source: reason.com 6/19/24 X’s child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the...
Interesting article. First the Chicago Police actively prevent people from obeying the law. Then later they arrest them for failure to obey the very law the police prevented them from obeying.
In the old days I’d have recommended a lawsuit. But the Supreme Court seems to have no problem with torture at Guantanamo, or with systematic violations of the Fourth Amendment by the NSA; so I don’t know if common sense, to say nothing of sanity, would prevail in such a lawsuit.
In case any registrants have plans of going to Chicago, Illinois requires you to register if you plan on spending three cumulative days in the state within one year. I doubt I’ll go there to visit my relatives anytime soon after reading some of these articles. They’ve taken it to a new level of regulatory measures. Thank goodness it’s not punitive.