MO: Area Counties to Charge for Sex Offender Registration

(ST. JOSEPH, Mo.) Sheriff’s departments from nine counties across northwest Missouri will be taking advantage of a law allowing them to charge sex offenders for maintaining the Sex Offender Registry program.

Representatives from four of those counties met at the Buchanan County Sheriff’s office Monday to talk about the charges. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mandating a fee is punitive not regulatory. Here lies the problem. If a fee is mandatory then the choice to not register should be given. Why? Well, it is mandatory to register your car if you are to drive it, but it is the individual’s choice to have a car. The registrant is not afforded the choice so it can be nothing but punitive which makes it ex post facto thereby making the act of registering a punitive measure and unconstitutional.

The registry by it’s nature is punitive and does break Constitutional law. That truth in time will be proven. There are two persons in violation of the spirit and letter of the US. Constitution. One is the law enforcement agency and/or officers. The other is the person being registered. It is in violation of the officer’s responsibility (their position) to uphold and enforce constitutional law as much as it is a violation of the individual’s rights not to register because of those unconstitutional ex post facto punitive measures.

We have in the past set aside the US Constitution and these provisions at times of war by the incarceration of Japanese citizens, the rounding up and murder of native Americans and the rights of women denied and that of blacks in the south. Remember these citizen after completing their probation, therapy and time served are by law entitled to the rights of all other citizens. Not to allow such is a slap in the face of God and all those that died to support that document we should hold most dear. TRUTH