TX: Mom fighting sex offender label in kidnapping

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Texas woman’s case is raising questions about whether parents who are convicted of kidnapping their own children in custody disputes should be automatically registered as sex offenders.

____ ____ was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to five years in prison after fleeing with her son to Mexico in 2002. She was freed from prison in 2010 but must register as a sex offender until 2020 even though she has never been accused or convicted of a sex-related crime. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Absolutely! What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. What really peeves me is that fact that nearly 100% of “abductions” are from a parent or guardian. Strange vs Parent = Parent more likely to abduct their children.. not a stranger. If a parent who takes a child .. it’s obviously serious enough to be entered in to the national databases such as Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Amber Alert systems.. etc. To me, that tells me it’s a serious matter. As such, it should be treated seriously.

Now if you ask me if this person should be on a separate registry than the sex offender registry, i would also say “absolutely”. While i don’t condone registries any more, i do say we shouldn’t be tainting existing sex-offender registries with non-sex-offence crimes. But we also shouldn’t put people on a sex offender registry unless they are a real risk to society.. and of course if probation and parole no longer apply, obviously they are not considered a risk anymore.

Take them off the registry dammit! I don’t wanna be associated with friggen Kidnappers!


Far.. far too late to be separate since those name flaws were from abduction kidnapping murder so they without due process include everyone on registry to those name flaw crimes ….talk about a sham you shouldn’t be included…..they will need to start freeing people from this further restraint registry…its ripe to end.

Just create an ex criminal registry, so everyone is on it. That’s fair. Heck the NSA has the computing capacity up there in Utah. No suggestive labels, just list facts: conviction, conviction date, reoffense rate of those with same type of convictions. Let the people decide which ones they are most afraid of.