ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021


Should registered sex offenders be allowed to keep lottery winnings?

Last month, Timothy Poole of Mount Dora, Florida, won nearly $3 million on a scratch-off lottery ticket purchased at a 7-Eleven. Like most jackpot winners, he was given a giant check and got his picture taken by the state lottery.

But that picture may have gained the ex-cab driver a lot more publicity than he ever wanted. Soon after Poole cashed in a lump sum of over $2.2 million dollars (after taxes), his picture was recognized and his past came back to haunt him. Poole is a registered sexual offender: After being arrested in 1999 in the wake of alleged sexual battery of a 9-year-old boy, he pleaded guilty to attempted sexual battery of a minor under 12.

“He was accused of heinous and horrible sex acts with a child,” said Orlando, Florida, attorney Mark NeJame, who is representing two brothers who say Poole sexually assaulted them in 1996. They have now filed a lawsuit against Poole for psychological damages and are asking for a share of his newfound winnings.  Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What about convicted drug dealers? Or D.U.I. drivers? Or domestic violence perpetrators? Oh no, the vigilante-attorneys and lawmakers only get worked up when it involves an RSO and they see an opportunity for moneymaking or free press coverage.

Seriously… the only crime in the US that bans you from wasting your money on the lottery? O.o

This is a slam dunk for the courts to rule against.

Under the Nuremberg laws the enlightened race,the Nazi’s, all subhuman groups were banned from even playing the lottery; let alone keep their winnings.

I never heard of restitution being a blank check with the amount written in after the sentencing. What’s next, taking the profits of someone who successfully plays the stock market or becomes successful in business?

The way I understand this story is that the plaintiffs suing for the lottery money are NOT the victim from his conviction which resulted in the registration status.

The plaintiffs here are ALLEGING abuse from way back when. He was never charged with, let alone convicted of, abusing them.

They feel strongly enough to participate in this money grab but not in criminal prosecution (which he totally deserves if he truly abused them).

With a lawyer hired on a contingency basis they have nothing to lose and a bundle to gain. Strange place this country has become…

So, let me get this straight. Does this just apply to child related offenses?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x