MN: Does ‘justice for all’ include sex offenders? (Opinion)

“And justice for all.” Boy, did I believe that as a child, when I placed my hand on my chest and recited the Pledge of Allegiance with fellow grade-school classmates. Although I grew up and smelled the coffee, that ideal is still implanted in my psyche.

Dan Gustafson also grew up not only believing in it but walking the talk as a trial lawyer. On Monday, the former high school dropout, twice named a “super lawyer” in Minnesota by a prestigious legal magazine, will go to bat in a federal courtroom in St. Paul for a group of people who have put the justice-for-all concept to perhaps one of its greatest tests.

I’m talking here about the 720 males and one woman civilly committed and undergoing treatment at secure facilities in Moose Lake and St. Peter as part of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program. Full Opinion Piece

Related: Constitutional Test for Minnesota Sex Offender Program

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The motivation, behind all sex offender laws are hate, which is, getting harder to conceal by the public safety lie.

“But it’s really important that our system of justice doesn’t decide things on whether we think the people are hateful or awful. Defending the due-process rights of the people society loves to hate is the most important thing a lawyer can do.”

Dan Gustafson sounds like an amazing man with the same true American morals and ideals as Janice. Since I stumbled upon this site I have been waiting for another freedom fighter to step forward; could this be the person? We’ll see and should be able to tell by what he does after this case; win or lose.

I’m having a hard time comprehending the logic of the below statement. How can indefinitely incarcerating people after they have completed their sentences be construed as anything other than punishment? I know the people that set on this court are called honorable (BARF!) and many other things, and they may very well be in the eyes of some, but to me I see quite the opposite of honorable when such a clear cut inability to see and acknowledge the obvious truth is seemingly absent. And let us not forget their lack of consideration of how the victims of this injustice think and feel.

“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled such civil commitment laws are constitutional because of compelling state interests in keeping the public safe from people judged to be a serious danger to society, as long as “there is no object or purpose to punish.” “

Sure, justice for all – except the ones deemed unworthy of a second chance!

America is a joke to the rest of the world.

“The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals.
Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them.
One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for man to live without breaking laws.”
– Ayn Rand, 1957