UK: York man is banned from having sex unless he gives police 24 hours’ notice

A YORK man has been banned from having any form of sexual activity with a woman – unless he tells police 24 hours in advance. He is also subject to controls on his use of the internet and must tell the police about every phone and device that he has that he could use for accessing the internet or calling or texting people.

The restrictions are part of an interim sexual risk order and will continue until May 19, when York magistrates will decide whether to make a full order and if so, for how long. … Sexual risk orders are a civil order and can be made when the person concerned has not been convicted of a sexual offence. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OMG! Coming soon to a neighborhood near you! The evolution of penalties…

What on earth did this man do? What in hell is a interim sexual risk order?!?!!

“They are used when someone has not been convicted of a sexual offence, but the police convince a court it is necessary for one to be made against the person to protect the public from him or her” WTF????

Sounds like the BS has been ratcheted up several notches over there across the pond!!

So if he has sex with men he doesn’t have to notify anybody? What about Pre-Op Transexuals?

Wait… A woman? So it’s only 1 woman he can’t have sex with?

No idea what is happening in this story. I do know it is ridiculous. Plus no person is going to want to have sex with this man once he explains why he wants their personal information prior to sex.

Something concerns me about this… not just the restrictions for sex… Lets go for any other offense, like alcohol .. The person would be banned from drinking, but also would be assigned to consoling and a “medical professional” to help the person with his/her alcohol problems… Ok with this in mind, what consoling and medical profession is this guy getting with this sex restriction? There are medical professions called surrogate sex counselors who working with a mental professional also… Why can’t we treat Register Citizens like alcoholics? Some Register Citizens might not have the skills or knowledge to navigate a healthy relationship? The government is too quick to restrict and punish, but not to heal or teach….

What is “person concerned has not been convicted of a sexual offence…” Is this a person with sexual transmitted diseases or is he really bad cook?

I wonder if, should he give notice and in the interim decide against it, he’d be in violation of his reporting requirement. Perhaps the government could or would compell him to follow through.

We really have reached a point of tragic comedy when legal authorities can concoct such a scheme and enforce it with a straight face. And I see they’re also adapt at reclassifying punishment as “civil” when a more accurate label presents conflicts.

If it were me, I’d get a friend to play along and I’d give notifications every 4-6 hours. I’d make every one of them jealous of all the action I’m getting.