Legal Scholars Call on Universities to Reform ‘Victim-Centered’ Sexual Misconduct Policies


Nearly 140 legal scholars have signed a letter calling on universities to reform current policies governing sexual misconduct allegations with a renewed focus on due process, rather than by a doctrine of “always believe the victim.”

The letter highlights dangers inherent in “‘victim-centered’ practices” that “undermine neutrality in campus Title IX processes,” and claims the imbalance has been plaguing institutions for nearly three decades.

According to the authors, the misleading victim-centered procedure was introduced in the early 1990s and been on the rise since the 2006 publication of an End Violence Against Women International manual, titled “Effective Report Writing,” which mapped out methodology for achieving a “successful prosecution” of sexual assault complaints.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In other words, acknowledge that some victims suffer from Lena Dunham syndrome. Recognize that inconsistent statements can equally be a sign of a false claim rather than evidence of trauma. In particular, the more outlandish a claim is, the more likely it’s made up.

Funny. Maybe I’m a prick, but that always sounded like common sense to me. It’s a crying shame that it took some serious (? Noticed the article didn’t name any of them) legal academics to point out what should be obvious.

After reading the 4 police statements in my case I’d say your analysis is pretty spot on for some cases. Reading how it was described in the report I would have been a gymnast.

The reports also included “statements” from my grandma that she had never made, stating that she was afraid of me. In reality she was scared for me, as the Klansman neighbors would often set their dogs on me when I was walking home from school or from the store or chase me down the street with their trucks and hit me because I was a chink.

But that was before the registry.

If this “victim centered” approach loses traction on campuses, maybe it’ll flow over onto all other court cases…That is a good thing! This change was a long time coming. I feel that victims need to heal and move forward with life just like the crime perpetrators need healing and moving on with their lives. Can’t stay a victim for all eternity….